Menu
GeneBe

rs118203415

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_000368.5(TSC1):ā€‹c.618T>Cā€‹(p.His206=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000533 in 1,614,210 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (ā˜…ā˜…).

Frequency

Genomes: š‘“ 0.00012 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes š‘“: 0.000047 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

TSC1
NM_000368.5 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:11O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.76
Variant links:
Genes affected
TSC1 (HGNC:12362): (TSC complex subunit 1) This gene is a tumor suppressor gene that encodes the growth inhibitory protein hamartin. The encoded protein interacts with and stabilizes the GTPase activating protein tuberin. This hamartin-tuberin complex negatively regulates mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) signaling which is a major regulator of anabolic cell growth. This protein also functions as a co-chaperone for Hsp90 that inhibits its ATPase activity. This protein functions as a facilitator of Hsp90-mediated folding of kinase and non-kinase clients, including TSC2 and thereby preventing their ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation. Mutations in this gene have been associated with tuberous sclerosis and lymphangioleiomyomatosis. [provided by RefSeq, May 2022]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.56).
BP6
Variant 9-132921864-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr9-132921864-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 49072.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr9-132921864-A-G is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=2.76 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000118 (18/152336) while in subpopulation EAS AF= 0.00289 (15/5186). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00178. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 10 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 18 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
TSC1NM_000368.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.618T>C p.His206= synonymous_variant 7/23 ENST00000298552.9

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
TSC1ENST00000298552.9 linkuse as main transcriptc.618T>C p.His206= synonymous_variant 7/231 NM_000368.5 P4Q92574-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000118
AC:
18
AN:
152218
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00289
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000621
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000203
AC:
51
AN:
251306
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000199
AC XY:
27
AN XY:
135810
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00256
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0000980
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000163
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000465
AC:
68
AN:
1461874
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0000468
AC XY:
34
AN XY:
727242
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00116
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000696
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000265
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000118
AC:
18
AN:
152336
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000134
AC XY:
10
AN XY:
74484
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00289
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.000621
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.0000427
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.0000756
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00491
AC:
17
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:11Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Tuberous sclerosis 1 Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabNov 07, 2021- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingKCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control CenterJul 07, 2023- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeFeb 01, 2024- -
Tuberous sclerosis syndrome Benign:2Other:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAll of Us Research Program, National Institutes of HealthJan 11, 2024- -
not provided, no classification providedcurationTuberous sclerosis database (TSC1)-- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJun 14, 2016- -
not specified Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxMay 16, 2013This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Nov 20, 2015- -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submittercurationSema4, Sema4Feb 18, 2021- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsJul 27, 2016This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
not provided Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingQuest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan CapistranoSep 12, 2019- -
Isolated focal cortical dysplasia type II Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJun 14, 2016- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.56
CADD
Benign
12
DANN
Benign
0.49
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.7

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs118203415; hg19: chr9-135797251; API