rs13324293

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_001099404.2(SCN5A):​c.5844C>T​(p.Ile1948Ile) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0121 in 1,612,626 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1,890 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.062 ( 1027 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0068 ( 863 hom. )

Consequence

SCN5A
NM_001099404.2 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:21

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.819

Publications

7 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
SCN5A (HGNC:10593): (sodium voltage-gated channel alpha subunit 5) The protein encoded by this gene is an integral membrane protein and tetrodotoxin-resistant voltage-gated sodium channel subunit. This protein is found primarily in cardiac muscle and is responsible for the initial upstroke of the action potential in an electrocardiogram. Defects in this gene have been associated with long QT syndrome type 3 (LQT3), atrial fibrillation, cardiomyopathy, and Brugada syndrome 1, all autosomal dominant cardiac diseases. Alternative splicing results in several transcript variants encoding different isoforms. [provided by RefSeq, May 2022]
SCN5A Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • Brugada syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Orphanet
  • Brugada syndrome 1
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, G2P, Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • dilated cardiomyopathy
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
  • dilated cardiomyopathy 1E
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics
  • familial long QT syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
  • long QT syndrome 3
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
  • sick sinus syndrome 1
    Inheritance: AD, AR Classification: STRONG, LIMITED Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • progressive familial heart block, type 1A
    Inheritance: SD, AD Classification: STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Genomics England PanelApp
  • atrial standstill
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • familial atrial fibrillation
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • familial isolated dilated cardiomyopathy
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • familial sick sinus syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • paroxysmal familial ventricular fibrillation
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • progressive familial heart block
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy
    Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: ClinGen
  • catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia
    Inheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen
  • short QT syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.48).
BP6
Variant 3-38550528-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr3-38550528-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 48311.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.819 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.211 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
SCN5ANM_001099404.2 linkc.5844C>T p.Ile1948Ile synonymous_variant Exon 28 of 28 ENST00000413689.6 NP_001092874.1 Q14524H9KVD2
SCN5ANM_000335.5 linkc.5841C>T p.Ile1947Ile synonymous_variant Exon 28 of 28 ENST00000423572.7 NP_000326.2 Q14524-2Q86V90

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
SCN5AENST00000413689.6 linkc.5844C>T p.Ile1948Ile synonymous_variant Exon 28 of 28 5 NM_001099404.2 ENSP00000410257.1 H9KVD2
SCN5AENST00000423572.7 linkc.5841C>T p.Ile1947Ile synonymous_variant Exon 28 of 28 1 NM_000335.5 ENSP00000398266.2 Q14524-2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0623
AC:
9481
AN:
152192
Hom.:
1026
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.215
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0258
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00202
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00289
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0222
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00103
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0454
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.0161
AC:
3974
AN:
247328
AF XY:
0.0125
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.217
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0119
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00280
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000983
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0101
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00683
AC:
9974
AN:
1460318
Hom.:
863
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.00604
AC XY:
4386
AN XY:
726280
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.222
AC:
7436
AN:
33450
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0137
AC:
613
AN:
44600
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00287
AC:
75
AN:
26090
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0000252
AC:
1
AN:
39656
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00124
AC:
107
AN:
86196
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
53356
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0132
AC:
76
AN:
5766
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000637
AC:
708
AN:
1110910
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0159
AC:
958
AN:
60294
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.495
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
541
1082
1623
2164
2705
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
236
472
708
944
1180
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0623
AC:
9491
AN:
152308
Hom.:
1027
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.0604
AC XY:
4503
AN XY:
74492
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.214
AC:
8903
AN:
41532
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0258
AC:
395
AN:
15306
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00202
AC:
7
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5180
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00290
AC:
14
AN:
4834
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10632
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0238
AC:
7
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00103
AC:
70
AN:
68034
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0450
AC:
95
AN:
2112
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.502
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
381
762
1143
1524
1905
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
86
172
258
344
430
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.0591
Hom.:
633
Bravo
AF:
0.0710
Asia WGS
AF:
0.0140
AC:
47
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.00147
EpiControl
AF:
0.00167

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:21
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:7
-
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jul 05, 2013
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Apr 09, 2025
Molecular Diagnostic Laboratory for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease, Montreal Heart Institute
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Mar 19, 2012
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

p.Ile1948Ile in Exon 28 of SCN5A: This variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it does not alter an amino acid residue, is not located wit hin the splice consensus sequence and has been identified in 20.5% (708/3454) of African American chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequenc ing Project (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs13324293). -

-
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:3
Mar 03, 2015
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Feb 04, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Brugada syndrome 1 Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Ventricular fibrillation, paroxysmal familial, type 1 Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Cardiomyopathy Benign:1
Nov 09, 2022
CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Congenital long QT syndrome Benign:1
Jun 14, 2016
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Dilated cardiomyopathy 1E Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Sick sinus syndrome 1 Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Progressive familial heart block, type 1A Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Primary dilated cardiomyopathy Benign:1
Sep 27, 2022
Cohesion Phenomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Jul 15, 2015
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Long QT syndrome 3 Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Cardiac arrhythmia Benign:1
Mar 15, 2018
Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.48
CADD
Benign
0.44
DANN
Benign
0.69
PhyloP100
-0.82
Mutation Taster
=98/2
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs13324293; hg19: chr3-38592019; API