rs138388301

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points: 0P and 10B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS2

The NM_138694.4(PKHD1):​c.3783C>T​(p.Gly1261Gly) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00103 in 1,614,034 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 3 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00097 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0010 ( 3 hom. )

Consequence

PKHD1
NM_138694.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:2B:8

Conservation

PhyloP100: -2.86
Variant links:
Genes affected
PKHD1 (HGNC:9016): (PKHD1 ciliary IPT domain containing fibrocystin/polyductin) The protein encoded by this gene is predicted to have a single transmembrane (TM)-spanning domain and multiple copies of an immunoglobulin-like plexin-transcription-factor domain. Alternative splicing results in two transcript variants encoding different isoforms. Other alternatively spliced transcripts have been described, but the full length sequences have not been determined. Several of these transcripts are predicted to encode truncated products which lack the TM and may be secreted. Mutations in this gene cause autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease, also known as polycystic kidney and hepatic disease-1. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.86).
BP6
Variant 6-52026027-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr6-52026027-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 262400.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=4, Uncertain_significance=2}. Variant chr6-52026027-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-2.86 with no splicing effect.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 3 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
PKHD1NM_138694.4 linkc.3783C>T p.Gly1261Gly synonymous_variant Exon 32 of 67 ENST00000371117.8 NP_619639.3 P08F94-1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
PKHD1ENST00000371117.8 linkc.3783C>T p.Gly1261Gly synonymous_variant Exon 32 of 67 1 NM_138694.4 ENSP00000360158.3 P08F94-1
PKHD1ENST00000340994.4 linkc.3783C>T p.Gly1261Gly synonymous_variant Exon 32 of 61 5 ENSP00000341097.4 P08F94-2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000973
AC:
148
AN:
152114
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000266
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.0571
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000193
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00123
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000583
AC:
146
AN:
250602
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000627
AC XY:
85
AN XY:
135618
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000248
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0000579
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0000545
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.000139
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00118
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000491
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00104
AC:
1514
AN:
1461802
Hom.:
3
Cov.:
37
AF XY:
0.00106
AC XY:
770
AN XY:
727202
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0000597
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0000894
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.0000383
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0000252
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.000225
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00131
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000546
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000972
AC:
148
AN:
152232
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00107
AC XY:
80
AN XY:
74442
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000265
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.000193
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00124
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.00108
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00115
EpiCase
AF:
0.000981
EpiControl
AF:
0.000948

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:8
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:1Benign:4
-
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jun 12, 2018
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Apr 26, 2021
GeneDx
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease Uncertain:1Benign:2
Nov 16, 2017
Natera, Inc.
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Oct 29, 2024
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

not specified Benign:2
-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Feb 18, 2022
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.86
CADD
Benign
0.12
DANN
Benign
0.47

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.030
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs138388301; hg19: chr6-51890825; COSMIC: COSV100582297; API