rs140997181

Positions:

chr14-49625668-G-A

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS1BS2

The NM_018139.3(DNAAF2):c.2388C>T(p.His796=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000332 in 1,613,706 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 4 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00023 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00034 ( 4 hom. )

Consequence

DNAAF2
NM_018139.3 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:2

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.496

Variant links:

Genes affected

DNAAF2 (HGNC:20188): (dynein axonemal assembly factor 2) This gene encodes a highly conserved protein involved in the preassembly of dynein arm complexes which power cilia. These complexes are found in some cilia and are assembled in the cytoplasm prior to transport for cilia formation. Mutations in this gene have been associated with primary ciliary dyskinesia. Multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene.[provided by RefSeq, Oct 2009]

DNAAF2 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.86).

BP6

Variant 14-49625668-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr14-49625668-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 313275.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=1, Benign=1, Uncertain_significance=1}.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.496 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00023 (35/152306) while in subpopulation SAS AF= 0.00643 (31/4818). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00466. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 29 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 4 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	Protein
DNAAF2	NM_018139.3 linkuse as main transcript	c.2388C>T	p.His796=	synonymous_variant	3/3	ENST00000298292.13	NP_060609.2
DNAAF2	NM_001083908.2 linkuse as main transcript	c.2244C>T	p.His748=	synonymous_variant	2/2		NP_001077377.1
DNAAF2	NM_001378453.1 linkuse as main transcript	c.177C>T	p.His59=	synonymous_variant	2/2		NP_001365382.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
DNAAF2	ENST00000298292.13 linkuse as main transcript	c.2388C>T	p.His796=	synonymous_variant	3/3	1	NM_018139.3	ENSP00000298292	P2	Q9NVR5-1
DNAAF2	ENST00000406043.3 linkuse as main transcript	c.2244C>T	p.His748=	synonymous_variant	2/2	1		ENSP00000384862	A2	Q9NVR5-2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000230

AC:

AN:

152188

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0000965

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00643

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000749

AC:

188

AN:

251048

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.000958

AC XY:

130

AN XY:

135684

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000123

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00604

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00000882

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000342

AC:

500

AN:

1461400

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000458

AC XY:

333

AN XY:

726998

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.0000299

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.0000253

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.00554

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.00000180

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.000298

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000230

AC:

AN:

152306

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000389

AC XY:

AN XY:

74464

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.0000962

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00643

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Alfa

AF:

0.0000417

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0000264

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00375

AC:

AN:

3478

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:2

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Primary ciliary dyskinesia

Benign:2

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp	Jan 25, 2024	- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Ambry Genetics	Aug 24, 2015	This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Primary ciliary dyskinesia 10

Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 13, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.86

CADD

Benign

1.2

DANN

Benign

0.74

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over