rs141856116

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The NM_001267550.2(TTN):c.25978G>A(p.Val8660Ile) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00103 in 1,613,644 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 9 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/18 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. V8660V) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0035 ( 1 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00078 ( 8 hom. )

Consequence

TTN
NM_001267550.2 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:24

Conservation

PhyloP100: 3.09

Publications

5 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

TTN (HGNC:12403): (titin) This gene encodes a large abundant protein of striated muscle. The product of this gene is divided into two regions, a N-terminal I-band and a C-terminal A-band. The I-band, which is the elastic part of the molecule, contains two regions of tandem immunoglobulin domains on either side of a PEVK region that is rich in proline, glutamate, valine and lysine. The A-band, which is thought to act as a protein-ruler, contains a mixture of immunoglobulin and fibronectin repeats, and possesses kinase activity. An N-terminal Z-disc region and a C-terminal M-line region bind to the Z-line and M-line of the sarcomere, respectively, so that a single titin molecule spans half the length of a sarcomere. Titin also contains binding sites for muscle associated proteins so it serves as an adhesion template for the assembly of contractile machinery in muscle cells. It has also been identified as a structural protein for chromosomes. Alternative splicing of this gene results in multiple transcript variants. Considerable variability exists in the I-band, the M-line and the Z-disc regions of titin. Variability in the I-band region contributes to the differences in elasticity of different titin isoforms and, therefore, to the differences in elasticity of different muscle types. Mutations in this gene are associated with familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 9, and autoantibodies to titin are produced in patients with the autoimmune disease scleroderma. [provided by RefSeq, Feb 2012]

TTN links:

TTN-AS1 (HGNC:44124): (TTN antisense RNA 1) This gene encodes a non-coding RNA transcribed from the opposite strand to the titin gene. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2016]

TTN-AS1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0039693415).

BP6

Variant 2-178715208-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-178715208-C-T is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 46771.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00346 (527/152252) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.0107 (444/41552). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00986. There are 1 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 245 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position passed quality control check.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 8 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
TTN	NM_001267550.2 link	c.25978G>A	p.Val8660Ile	missense_variant	Exon 90 of 363	ENST00000589042.5	NP_001254479.2	A0A0A0MTS7

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
TTN	ENST00000589042.5 link	c.25978G>A	p.Val8660Ile	missense_variant	Exon 90 of 363	5	NM_001267550.2	ENSP00000467141.1		A0A0A0MTS7

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00346

AC:

527

AN:

152134

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0107

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00216

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00634

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00316

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000309

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00287

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.00133

AC:

331

AN:

248738

AF XY:

0.00107

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0112

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00130

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00557

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000435

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000995

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000777

AC:

1135

AN:

1461392

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000732

AC XY:

532

AN XY:

726980

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0109

AC:

366

AN:

33448

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00143

AC:

AN:

44712

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00689

AC:

180

AN:

26122

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39696

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.0000464

AC:

AN:

86232

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53396

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00191

AC:

AN:

5754

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.000363

AC:

403

AN:

1111666

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00177

AC:

107

AN:

60366

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.478

Heterozygous variant carriers

133

200

266

333

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

120

150

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00346

AC:

527

AN:

152252

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00329

AC XY:

245

AN XY:

74424

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0107

AC:

444

AN:

41552

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00216

AC:

AN:

15292

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00634

AC:

AN:

3472

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5174

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4824

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10602

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00340

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.000309

AC:

AN:

68016

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00284

AC:

AN:

2114

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.499

Heterozygous variant carriers

114

142

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.00135

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00408

TwinsUK

AF:

0.00

AC:

ALSPAC

AF:

0.000259

AC:

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.00963

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.000609

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.00139

AC:

168

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000577

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.000764

EpiControl

AF:

0.000534

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:24

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:11

Sep 14, 2019

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center

Significance:Benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jun 24, 2013

Biesecker Lab/Clinical Genomics Section, National Institutes of Health

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:research

- -

Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center

Significance:Benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jun 08, 2015

GeneDx

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+

Significance:Benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Nov 09, 2020

Athena Diagnostics

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Mar 16, 2012

Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Val7416Ile in exon 87 of TTN: This variant is not expected to have clinical sign ificance because it has been identified in 1.0% (30/3050) of African American ch romosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (http:// evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs141856116). Val7416Ile in exon 87 of TTN (rs 141856116; allele frequency = 1.0%, 30/3050) ** -

Aug 06, 2015

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Apr 09, 2025

Molecular Diagnostic Laboratory for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease, Montreal Heart Institute

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen

Significance:Benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided

Benign:4

Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

May 07, 2021

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Feb 10, 2015

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Nov 01, 2024

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

TTN: BP4, BS1 -

Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2J

Uncertain:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

TTN-related disorder

Benign:1

May 29, 2019

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance:Benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2J;C1858763:Dilated cardiomyopathy 1G

Benign:1

Feb 02, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Dilated cardiomyopathy 1G

Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Cardiomyopathy

Benign:1

Nov 20, 2018

CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Early-onset myopathy with fatal cardiomyopathy

Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Myopathy, myofibrillar, 9, with early respiratory failure

Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Tibial muscular dystrophy

Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Ventricular tachycardia;C0878544:Cardiomyopathy

Benign:1

Jun 03, 2019

Center for Advanced Laboratory Medicine, UC San Diego Health, University of California San Diego

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Cardiovascular phenotype

Benign:1

Dec 14, 2012

Ambry Genetics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.077

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.54

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.53

CADD

Benign

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.95

Eigen

Benign

-0.077

Eigen_PC

Benign

0.053

FATHMM_MKL

Uncertain

0.93

LIST_S2

Benign

0.72

T;T;.;T

MetaRNN

Benign

0.0040

T;T;T;T

MetaSVM

Benign

-0.98

PhyloP100

3.1

PrimateAI

Benign

0.29

PROVEAN

Benign

-0.72

N;.;.;.

REVEL

Benign

0.061

Sift

Benign

0.30

T;.;.;.

Polyphen

0.0020

.;.;B;B

Vest4

0.078

MVP

0.30

MPC

0.070

ClinPred

0.012

GERP RS

3.8

Mutation Taster

=81/19

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over