rs141856116

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The NM_001267550.2(TTN):​c.25978G>A​(p.Val8660Ile) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00103 in 1,613,644 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 9 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/17 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0035 ( 1 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00078 ( 8 hom. )

Consequence

TTN
NM_001267550.2 missense

Scores

1
14

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:23

Conservation

PhyloP100: 3.09
Variant links:
Genes affected
TTN (HGNC:12403): (titin) This gene encodes a large abundant protein of striated muscle. The product of this gene is divided into two regions, a N-terminal I-band and a C-terminal A-band. The I-band, which is the elastic part of the molecule, contains two regions of tandem immunoglobulin domains on either side of a PEVK region that is rich in proline, glutamate, valine and lysine. The A-band, which is thought to act as a protein-ruler, contains a mixture of immunoglobulin and fibronectin repeats, and possesses kinase activity. An N-terminal Z-disc region and a C-terminal M-line region bind to the Z-line and M-line of the sarcomere, respectively, so that a single titin molecule spans half the length of a sarcomere. Titin also contains binding sites for muscle associated proteins so it serves as an adhesion template for the assembly of contractile machinery in muscle cells. It has also been identified as a structural protein for chromosomes. Alternative splicing of this gene results in multiple transcript variants. Considerable variability exists in the I-band, the M-line and the Z-disc regions of titin. Variability in the I-band region contributes to the differences in elasticity of different titin isoforms and, therefore, to the differences in elasticity of different muscle types. Mutations in this gene are associated with familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 9, and autoantibodies to titin are produced in patients with the autoimmune disease scleroderma. [provided by RefSeq, Feb 2012]
TTN-AS1 (HGNC:44124): (TTN antisense RNA 1) This gene encodes a non-coding RNA transcribed from the opposite strand to the titin gene. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2016]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0039693415).
BP6
Variant 2-178715208-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-178715208-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 46771.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=7, Benign=10, Uncertain_significance=1}. Variant chr2-178715208-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr2-178715208-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00346 (527/152252) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0107 (444/41552). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00986. There are 1 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 245 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 8 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
TTNNM_001267550.2 linkc.25978G>A p.Val8660Ile missense_variant Exon 90 of 363 ENST00000589042.5 NP_001254479.2 A0A0A0MTS7

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
TTNENST00000589042.5 linkc.25978G>A p.Val8660Ile missense_variant Exon 90 of 363 5 NM_001267550.2 ENSP00000467141.1 A0A0A0MTS7

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00346
AC:
527
AN:
152134
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0107
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00216
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00634
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00316
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000309
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00287
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00133
AC:
331
AN:
248738
Hom.:
2
AF XY:
0.00107
AC XY:
145
AN XY:
134960
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0112
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00130
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00557
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0000327
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000435
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000995
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000777
AC:
1135
AN:
1461392
Hom.:
8
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.000732
AC XY:
532
AN XY:
726980
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0109
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00143
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00689
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000464
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000363
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00177
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00346
AC:
527
AN:
152252
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00329
AC XY:
245
AN XY:
74424
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0107
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00216
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00634
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000309
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00284
Alfa
AF:
0.00130
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00408
TwinsUK
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ALSPAC
AF:
0.000259
AC:
1
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00963
AC:
36
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.000609
AC:
5
ExAC
AF:
0.00139
AC:
168
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000577
AC:
2
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.000764
EpiControl
AF:
0.000534

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:23
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:10
Nov 09, 2020
Athena Diagnostics
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jun 08, 2015
GeneDx
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Jun 24, 2013
Biesecker Lab/Clinical Genomics Section, National Institutes of Health
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: research

- -

Mar 16, 2012
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

Val7416Ile in exon 87 of TTN: This variant is not expected to have clinical sign ificance because it has been identified in 1.0% (30/3050) of African American ch romosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (http:// evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs141856116). Val7416Ile in exon 87 of TTN (rs 141856116; allele frequency = 1.0%, 30/3050) ** -

Sep 14, 2019
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Aug 06, 2015
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:4
May 07, 2021
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Feb 10, 2015
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Nov 01, 2024
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

TTN: BP4, BS1 -

Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2J Uncertain:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

TTN-related disorder Benign:1
May 29, 2019
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2J;C1858763:Dilated cardiomyopathy 1G Benign:1
Feb 02, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Dilated cardiomyopathy 1G Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Cardiomyopathy Benign:1
Nov 20, 2018
CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Early-onset myopathy with fatal cardiomyopathy Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Myopathy, myofibrillar, 9, with early respiratory failure Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Tibial muscular dystrophy Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Ventricular tachycardia;C0878544:Cardiomyopathy Benign:1
Jun 03, 2019
Center for Advanced Laboratory Medicine, UC San Diego Health, University of California San Diego
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Dec 14, 2012
Ambry Genetics
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.077
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.54
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.53
CADD
Benign
18
DANN
Benign
0.95
Eigen
Benign
-0.077
Eigen_PC
Benign
0.053
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.93
D
LIST_S2
Benign
0.72
T;T;.;T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0040
T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.98
T
PrimateAI
Benign
0.29
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.72
N;.;.;.
REVEL
Benign
0.061
Sift
Benign
0.30
T;.;.;.
Polyphen
0.0020
.;.;B;B
Vest4
0.078
MVP
0.30
MPC
0.070
ClinPred
0.012
T
GERP RS
3.8

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs141856116; hg19: chr2-179579935; API