rs143316848

Positions:

chr22-36318258-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_002473.6(MYH9):c.1176G>A(p.Pro392Pro) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000288 in 1,613,762 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0011 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00021 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

MYH9
NM_002473.6 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:7

Conservation

PhyloP100: -2.10

Variant links:

Genes affected

MYH9 (HGNC:7579): (myosin heavy chain 9) This gene encodes a conventional non-muscle myosin; this protein should not be confused with the unconventional myosin-9a or 9b (MYO9A or MYO9B). The encoded protein is a myosin IIA heavy chain that contains an IQ domain and a myosin head-like domain which is involved in several important functions, including cytokinesis, cell motility and maintenance of cell shape. Defects in this gene have been associated with non-syndromic sensorineural deafness autosomal dominant type 17, Epstein syndrome, Alport syndrome with macrothrombocytopenia, Sebastian syndrome, Fechtner syndrome and macrothrombocytopenia with progressive sensorineural deafness. [provided by RefSeq, Dec 2011]

MYH9 links:

MYH9 (HGNC:):

MYH9 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.5).

BP6

Variant 22-36318258-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr22-36318258-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 226750.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-2.1 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00107 (162/151916) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.00366 (151/41202). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00319. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 76 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 162 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	Protein	UniProt
MYH9	NM_002473.6 linkuse as main transcript	c.1176G>A	p.Pro392Pro	synonymous_variant	11/41	ENST00000216181.11	NP_002464.1	P35579-1A0A024R1N1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
MYH9	ENST00000216181.11 linkuse as main transcript	c.1176G>A	p.Pro392Pro	synonymous_variant	11/41	1	NM_002473.6	ENSP00000216181.6		P35579-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00106

AC:

161

AN:

151796

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00368

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00135

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000147

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.000958

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000469

AC:

118

AN:

251442

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.000434

AC XY:

AN XY:

135910

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00431

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000145

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00190

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.0000653

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000264

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000489

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000207

AC:

303

AN:

1461846

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000190

AC XY:

138

AN XY:

727210

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.00559

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.000157

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00174

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.0000464

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.0000234

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.000166

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00107

AC:

162

AN:

151916

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00102

AC XY:

AN XY:

74284

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.00366

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00135

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.000207

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.0000147

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.000948

Alfa

AF:

0.000521

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00137

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000289

AC:

AN:

3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:7

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Benign:3

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp	Jan 13, 2024	- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	GeneDx	Sep 24, 2020	- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	not provided	Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics	-	- -

not specified

Benign:2

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine	Feb 18, 2015	p.Pro392Pro in exon 11 of MYH9: This variant is not expected to have clinical si gnificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue, is not located withi n the splice consensus sequence, and has been identified in 0.4% (39/10364) of A frican chromosomes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.broadi nstitute.org; dbSNP rs143316848). -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences	-	- -

Autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss 17

Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 12, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

MYH9-related disorder

Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 12, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.50

CADD

Benign

1.7

DANN

Benign

0.88

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.7

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over