rs144639596

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7

The NM_005732.4(RAD50):c.921A>G(p.Leu307Leu) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000103 in 1,613,266 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00056 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000055 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

RAD50
NM_005732.4 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:4

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.665

Publications

3 publications found

Variant links:

COSMIC-nc: COSV107315537

Genes affected

RAD50 (HGNC:9816): (RAD50 double strand break repair protein) The protein encoded by this gene is highly similar to Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rad50, a protein involved in DNA double-strand break repair. This protein forms a complex with MRE11 and NBS1. The protein complex binds to DNA and displays numerous enzymatic activities that are required for nonhomologous joining of DNA ends. This protein, cooperating with its partners, is important for DNA double-strand break repair, cell cycle checkpoint activation, telomere maintenance, and meiotic recombination. Knockout studies of the mouse homolog suggest this gene is essential for cell growth and viability. Mutations in this gene are the cause of Nijmegen breakage syndrome-like disorder.[provided by RefSeq, Apr 2010]

RAD50 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

Nijmegen breakage syndrome-like disorder
Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
familial ovarian cancer
Inheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen
hereditary breast carcinoma
Inheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen

RAD50 links:

ENSG00000283782 (HGNC:):

ENSG00000283782 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.75).

BP6

Variant 5-132587959-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr5-132587959-A-G is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 184312.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.665 with no splicing effect.

Variant Effect in Transcripts

ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_005732.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.

RefSeq Transcripts

Selected	Gene	Transcript	Tags	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon Rank	Protein	UniProt
	RAD50	NM_005732.4	MANE Select	c.921A>G	p.Leu307Leu	synonymous	Exon 7 of 25	NP_005723.2

Ensembl Transcripts

Gene	Transcript	Tags	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon Rank	Protein
RAD50	ENST00000378823.8	TSL:1 MANE Select	c.921A>G	p.Leu307Leu	synonymous	Exon 7 of 25	ENSP00000368100.4
ENSG00000283782	ENST00000638452.2	TSL:5	c.624A>G	p.Leu208Leu	synonymous	Exon 9 of 27	ENSP00000492349.2
RAD50	ENST00000533482.5	TSL:1	n.*547A>G		non_coding_transcript_exon	Exon 7 of 25	ENSP00000431225.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000558

AC:

AN:

152226

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00200

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.0000654

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000147

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.000128

AC:

AN:

250254

AF XY:

0.000118

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00192

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00000886

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000554

AC:

AN:

1460922

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000509

AC XY:

AN XY:

726830

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00170

AC:

AN:

33446

American (AMR)

AF:

0.0000224

AC:

AN:

44708

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26110

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39580

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

86228

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53348

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5764

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000144

AC:

AN:

1111376

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000116

AC:

AN:

60362

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.468

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000558

AC:

AN:

152344

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000591

AC XY:

AN XY:

74488

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00200

AC:

AN:

41578

American (AMR)

AF:

0.0000653

AC:

AN:

15304

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3468

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5192

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4832

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10618

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000147

AC:

AN:

68032

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

2114

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.483

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.000395

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000506

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:4

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Benign:2

Dec 02, 2024

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Oct 08, 2014

Ambry Genetics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity.

not specified

Benign:1

Jun 10, 2023

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

RAD50-related disorder

Benign:1

Jan 26, 2022

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications).

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.9

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.75

CADD

Benign

6.5

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.68

PhyloP100

0.67

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.7

Mutation Taster

=100/0

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Variant Effect in Transcripts

RefSeq Transcripts

Ensembl Transcripts

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over