rs146217031

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -17 ACMG points: 0P and 17B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1

The NM_002180.3(IGHMBP2):c.276C>T(p.Tyr92Tyr) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0002 in 1,613,920 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0011 ( 0 hom., cov: 31)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00011 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

IGHMBP2
NM_002180.3 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:5

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.0590

Publications

2 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

IGHMBP2 (HGNC:5542): (immunoglobulin mu DNA binding protein 2) This gene encodes a helicase superfamily member that binds a specific DNA sequence from the immunoglobulin mu chain switch region. Mutations in this gene lead to spinal muscle atrophy with respiratory distress type 1. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

IGHMBP2 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

autosomal recessive distal spinal muscular atrophy 1
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: G2P, Ambry Genetics, Genomics England PanelApp, Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease axonal type 2S
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Orphanet, Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
hereditary peripheral neuropathy
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen

IGHMBP2 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -17 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.62).

BP6

Variant 11-68908164-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-68908164-C-T is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 377972.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.059 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00107 (163/152118) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.00359 (149/41490). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00312. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 80 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 31. This position passed quality control check.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein
IGHMBP2	NM_002180.3 link	c.276C>T	p.Tyr92Tyr	synonymous_variant	Exon 3 of 15	ENST00000255078.8	NP_002171.2
IGHMBP2	XM_047426881.1 link	c.276C>T	p.Tyr92Tyr	synonymous_variant	Exon 3 of 15		XP_047282837.1
IGHMBP2	XM_017017671.3 link	c.276C>T	p.Tyr92Tyr	synonymous_variant	Exon 3 of 12		XP_016873160.1
IGHMBP2	XM_005273976.3 link	c.276C>T	p.Tyr92Tyr	synonymous_variant	Exon 3 of 9		XP_005274033.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
IGHMBP2	ENST00000255078.8 link	c.276C>T	p.Tyr92Tyr	synonymous_variant	Exon 3 of 15	1	NM_002180.3	ENSP00000255078.4

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00105

AC:

159

AN:

152000

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00351

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000787

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.000960

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.000290

AC:

AN:

251354

AF XY:

0.000191

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00375

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000116

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.0000544

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000176

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000652

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000109

AC:

159

AN:

1461802

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000839

AC XY:

AN XY:

727198

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00326

AC:

109

AN:

33474

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000201

AC:

AN:

44724

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26136

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39700

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.0000116

AC:

AN:

86254

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53406

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.000173

AC:

AN:

5766

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00000540

AC:

AN:

1111948

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000546

AC:

AN:

60394

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.458

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00107

AC:

163

AN:

152118

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00108

AC XY:

AN XY:

74370

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00359

AC:

149

AN:

41490

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000786

AC:

AN:

15276

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3470

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5176

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4808

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10588

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

67998

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000950

AC:

AN:

2106

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.507

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.000474

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00121

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:5

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Benign:2

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:not provided

- -

Dec 16, 2020

GeneDx

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

IGHMBP2-related disorder

Benign:1

Oct 28, 2019

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Inborn genetic diseases

Benign:1

Jul 11, 2019

Ambry Genetics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Autosomal recessive distal spinal muscular atrophy 1;C4015349:Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease axonal type 2S

Benign:1

Jan 11, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.62

CADD

Benign

1.2

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.68

PhyloP100

0.059

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over