Menu
GeneBe

rs147259744

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_021625.5(TRPV4):c.1824+4C>T variant causes a splice donor region, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000454 in 1,614,090 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 7 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0022 ( 6 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00027 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

TRPV4
NM_021625.5 splice_donor_region, intron

Scores

2
Splicing: ADA: 0.0001161
2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:11

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.960
Variant links:
Genes affected
TRPV4 (HGNC:18083): (transient receptor potential cation channel subfamily V member 4) This gene encodes a member of the OSM9-like transient receptor potential channel (OTRPC) subfamily in the transient receptor potential (TRP) superfamily of ion channels. The encoded protein is a Ca2+-permeable, nonselective cation channel that is thought to be involved in the regulation of systemic osmotic pressure. Mutations in this gene are the cause of spondylometaphyseal and metatropic dysplasia and hereditary motor and sensory neuropathy type IIC. Multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2010]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.71).
BP6
Variant 12-109792648-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr12-109792648-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 283590.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr12-109792648-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00223 (340/152252) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.00737 (306/41540). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00669. There are 6 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 149 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd at 323 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
TRPV4NM_021625.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.1824+4C>T splice_donor_region_variant, intron_variant ENST00000261740.7

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
TRPV4ENST00000261740.7 linkuse as main transcriptc.1824+4C>T splice_donor_region_variant, intron_variant 1 NM_021625.5 P1Q9HBA0-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00212
AC:
323
AN:
152134
Hom.:
3
Cov.:
31
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00698
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00151
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000193
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00316
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000735
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00191
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000593
AC:
149
AN:
251368
Hom.:
1
AF XY:
0.000339
AC XY:
46
AN XY:
135876
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00628
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000723
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.000163
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000114
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000978
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000268
AC:
392
AN:
1461838
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.000242
AC XY:
176
AN XY:
727232
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00738
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000850
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.000151
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000348
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000477
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000712
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00223
AC:
340
AN:
152252
Hom.:
6
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.00200
AC XY:
149
AN XY:
74452
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00737
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00150
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.000193
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000735
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00189
Alfa
AF:
0.00125
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00257
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00202
AC:
7
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:11
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease axonal type 2C Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 31, 2024- -
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesSep 06, 2023- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxAug 26, 2020- -
not specified Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Oct 08, 2015- -
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMolecular Genetics Laboratory, London Health Sciences Centre-- -
Neuronopathy, distal hereditary motor, autosomal dominant 8 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Scapuloperoneal spinal muscular atrophy Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Brachyrachia (short spine dysplasia) Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Spondylometaphyseal dysplasia, Kozlowski type Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Metatropic dysplasia Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.71
Cadd
Benign
0.030
Dann
Benign
0.66

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
dbscSNV1_ADA
Benign
0.00012
dbscSNV1_RF
Benign
0.022
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs147259744; hg19: chr12-110230453; API