rs147641822

Positions:

chr11-1759628-G-A

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points: 2P and 10B. PM2BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS1

The NM_001909.5(CTSD):c.240C>T(p.Tyr80Tyr) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00021 in 1,613,196 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00019 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00021 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

CTSD
NM_001909.5 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:4

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.26

Variant links:

Genes affected

CTSD (HGNC:2529): (cathepsin D) This gene encodes a member of the A1 family of peptidases. The encoded preproprotein is proteolytically processed to generate multiple protein products. These products include the cathepsin D light and heavy chains, which heterodimerize to form the mature enzyme. This enzyme exhibits pepsin-like activity and plays a role in protein turnover and in the proteolytic activation of hormones and growth factors. Mutations in this gene play a causal role in neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis-10 and may be involved in the pathogenesis of several other diseases, including breast cancer and possibly Alzheimer's disease. [provided by RefSeq, Nov 2015]

CTSD links:

ENSG00000250644 (HGNC:):

ENSG00000250644 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points.

PM2

Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.65).

BP6

Variant 11-1759628-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-1759628-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 137050.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=2, Uncertain_significance=1, Benign=1}.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-1.26 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4_exome allele frequency = 0.000212 (309/1460868) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.000244 (271/1111828). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00022. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4_exome. There are 149 alleles in male gnomad4_exome subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	Protein	UniProt
CTSD	NM_001909.5 linkuse as main transcript	c.240C>T	p.Tyr80Tyr	synonymous_variant	3/9	ENST00000236671.7	NP_001900.1	P07339V9HWI3

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
CTSD	ENST00000236671.7 linkuse as main transcript	c.240C>T	p.Tyr80Tyr	synonymous_variant	3/9	1	NM_001909.5	ENSP00000236671.2		P07339
ENSG00000250644	ENST00000636615.1 linkuse as main transcript	c.240C>T	p.Tyr80Tyr	synonymous_variant	3/10	5		ENSP00000490014.1		A0A1B0GU92

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000191

AC:

AN:

152212

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000193

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.0000654

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000207

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000279

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000116

AC:

AN:

249742

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.000126

AC XY:

AN XY:

135380

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000187

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.0000545

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.0000653

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000204

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000212

AC:

309

AN:

1460868

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000205

AC XY:

149

AN XY:

726740

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.0000299

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.0000447

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.0000252

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.000128

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.000244

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.000381

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000190

AC:

AN:

152328

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000201

AC XY:

AN XY:

74488

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.000192

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.0000653

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.000207

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.000279

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Alfa

AF:

0.000396

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000170

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00404

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.000382

EpiControl

AF:

0.000237

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:4

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis 10

Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 12, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

not specified

Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

GeneDx

Mar 26, 2014

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Inborn genetic diseases

Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Ambry Genetics

Nov 21, 2016

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis

Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Jan 30, 2024

- -

CTSD-related disorder

Benign:1

Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided

clinical testing

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Nov 22, 2019

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.65

CADD

Benign

7.8

DANN

Benign

0.89

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.8

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over