rs148293104

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_001999.4(FBN2):​c.6000A>G​(p.Leu2000Leu) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000795 in 1,613,430 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 9 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0041 ( 5 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00046 ( 4 hom. )

Consequence

FBN2
NM_001999.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:7

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.28

Publications

1 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
FBN2 (HGNC:3604): (fibrillin 2) The protein encoded by this gene is a component of connective tissue microfibrils and may be involved in elastic fiber assembly. Mutations in this gene cause congenital contractural arachnodactyly. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
FBN2 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • congenital contractural arachnodactyly
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: PanelApp Australia, Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, Genomics England PanelApp
  • carpal tunnel syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Franklin by Genoox
  • familial thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection
    Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: ClinGen
  • macular degeneration, early-onset
    Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.79).
BP6
Variant 5-128301428-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr5-128301428-T-C is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 213241.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-1.28 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00406 (618/152286) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.0141 (587/41562). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0132. There are 5 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 303 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 618 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
FBN2NM_001999.4 linkc.6000A>G p.Leu2000Leu synonymous_variant Exon 47 of 65 ENST00000262464.9 NP_001990.2
FBN2XM_017009228.3 linkc.5847A>G p.Leu1949Leu synonymous_variant Exon 46 of 64 XP_016864717.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
FBN2ENST00000262464.9 linkc.6000A>G p.Leu2000Leu synonymous_variant Exon 47 of 65 1 NM_001999.4 ENSP00000262464.4
FBN2ENST00000703783.1 linkn.2784A>G non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 22 of 38
FBN2ENST00000703785.1 linkn.2703A>G non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 21 of 27

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00406
AC:
618
AN:
152168
Hom.:
5
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0142
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00177
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000193
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000147
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000478
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00122
AC:
307
AN:
251250
AF XY:
0.000913
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0166
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000781
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0000544
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000816
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000455
AC:
665
AN:
1461144
Hom.:
4
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
0.000420
AC XY:
305
AN XY:
726928
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0156
AC:
522
AN:
33456
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000827
AC:
37
AN:
44720
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
26124
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0000757
AC:
3
AN:
39636
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000104
AC:
9
AN:
86242
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
53332
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.000520
AC:
3
AN:
5764
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000279
AC:
31
AN:
1111500
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000994
AC:
60
AN:
60370
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.472
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
35
70
105
140
175
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
20
40
60
80
100
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00406
AC:
618
AN:
152286
Hom.:
5
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00407
AC XY:
303
AN XY:
74466
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0141
AC:
587
AN:
41562
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00176
AC:
27
AN:
15302
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.000193
AC:
1
AN:
5182
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000208
AC:
1
AN:
4818
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10602
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000147
AC:
1
AN:
68028
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000473
AC:
1
AN:
2114
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.509
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
33
66
98
131
164
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
10
20
30
40
50
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00199
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00453
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000577
AC:
2
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.00
EpiControl
AF:
0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:7
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:2
Jun 23, 2014
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Jul 21, 2023
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Congenital contractural arachnodactyly Benign:2
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Jan 15, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Familial thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection Benign:1
Sep 22, 2015
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Ehlers-Danlos syndrome Benign:1
Feb 01, 2020
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick Children
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:1
Oct 18, 2023
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.79
CADD
Benign
0.88
DANN
Benign
0.56
PhyloP100
-1.3
Mutation Taster
=99/1
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.010
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs148293104; hg19: chr5-127637120; API