rs148392780

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -17 ACMG points: 0P and 17B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS2

The NM_006514.4(SCN10A):c.87T>C(p.Ala29Ala) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000874 in 1,613,904 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000072 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000089 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

SCN10A
NM_006514.4 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:6

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.377

Publications

0 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

SCN10A (HGNC:10582): (sodium voltage-gated channel alpha subunit 10) The protein encoded by this gene is a tetrodotoxin-resistant voltage-gated sodium channel alpha subunit. The properties of the channel formed by the encoded transmembrane protein can be altered by interaction with different beta subunits. This protein may be involved in the onset of pain associated with peripheral neuropathy. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Jun 2014]

SCN10A Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

sodium channelopathy-related small fiber neuropathy
Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
episodic pain syndrome, familial, 2
Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED, NO_KNOWN Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Illumina, Ambry Genetics
Brugada syndrome
Inheritance: Unknown Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
Brugada syndrome 1
Inheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen

SCN10A links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -17 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.68).

BP6

Variant 3-38793924-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr3-38793924-A-G is described in ClinVar as Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 240683.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.377 with no splicing effect.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 11 AD,Unknown gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
SCN10A	NM_006514.4 link	c.87T>C	p.Ala29Ala	synonymous_variant	Exon 2 of 28	ENST00000449082.3	NP_006505.4	Q9Y5Y9

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	UniProt
SCN10A	ENST00000449082.3 link	c.87T>C	p.Ala29Ala	synonymous_variant	Exon 2 of 28	1	NM_006514.4	ENSP00000390600.2	Q9Y5Y9
SCN10A	ENST00000643924.1 link	c.87T>C	p.Ala29Ala	synonymous_variant	Exon 1 of 27			ENSP00000495595.1	A0A2R8Y6J6
SCN10A	ENST00000655275.1 link	c.87T>C	p.Ala29Ala	synonymous_variant	Exon 2 of 28			ENSP00000499510.1	A0A590UJM0

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0000723

AC:

AN:

152122

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000131

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000118

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.000478

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.000128

AC:

AN:

250938

AF XY:

0.000133

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.0000924

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000247

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000327

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000889

AC:

130

AN:

1461782

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000908

AC XY:

AN XY:

727196

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

33472

American (AMR)

AF:

0.0000447

AC:

AN:

44714

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26126

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39696

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.0000116

AC:

AN:

86258

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.0000374

AC:

AN:

53420

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5768

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.000108

AC:

120

AN:

1111938

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.0000828

AC:

AN:

60390

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.470

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0000723

AC:

AN:

152122

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000673

AC XY:

AN XY:

74308

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

41426

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000131

AC:

AN:

15262

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3470

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5192

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4818

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10620

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

316

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.000118

AC:

AN:

68014

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000478

AC:

AN:

2092

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.552

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.000154

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0000982

EpiCase

AF:

0.000164

EpiControl

AF:

0.000119

ClinVar

Significance: Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:6

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Benign:3

Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jun 01, 2024

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

SCN10A: BP4, BP7 -

Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not specified

Benign:1

Sep 01, 2017

GeneDx

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Brugada syndrome

Benign:1

Jan 29, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Cardiovascular phenotype

Benign:1

Jul 11, 2019

Ambry Genetics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.68

CADD

Benign

4.3

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.61

PhyloP100

-0.38

PromoterAI

-0.050

Neutral

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over