rs149586418

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -15 ACMG points: 0P and 15B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS2

The NM_201596.3(CACNB2):c.915T>C(p.Phe305Phe) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000477 in 1,614,018 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0026 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00026 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

CACNB2
NM_201596.3 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:5

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.71

Publications

0 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

CACNB2 (HGNC:1402): (calcium voltage-gated channel auxiliary subunit beta 2) This gene encodes a subunit of a voltage-dependent calcium channel protein that is a member of the voltage-gated calcium channel superfamily. The gene product was originally identified as an antigen target in Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome, an autoimmune disorder. Mutations in this gene are associated with Brugada syndrome. Alternatively spliced variants encoding different isoforms have been described. [provided by RefSeq, Feb 2013]

CACNB2 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

Brugada syndrome 4
Inheritance: AD, Unknown Classification: LIMITED, NO_KNOWN Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Genomics England PanelApp, Ambry Genetics, Laboratory for Molecular Medicine
Brugada syndrome 1
Inheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen
hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
Inheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen
short QT syndrome
Inheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen

CACNB2 links:

ENSG00000240291 (HGNC:58168):

ENSG00000240291 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -15 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.46).

BP6

Variant 10-18518939-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr10-18518939-T-C is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 190715.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=2.71 with no splicing effect.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 397 AD,Unknown gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
CACNB2	NM_201596.3 link	c.915T>C	p.Phe305Phe	synonymous_variant	Exon 9 of 14	ENST00000324631.13	NP_963890.2
CACNB2	NM_201590.3 link	c.753T>C	p.Phe251Phe	synonymous_variant	Exon 8 of 13	ENST00000377329.10	NP_963884.2

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
CACNB2	ENST00000324631.13 link	c.915T>C	p.Phe305Phe	synonymous_variant	Exon 9 of 14	1	NM_201596.3	ENSP00000320025.8
CACNB2	ENST00000377329.10 link	c.753T>C	p.Phe251Phe	synonymous_variant	Exon 8 of 13	1	NM_201590.3	ENSP00000366546.4

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00260

AC:

396

AN:

152216

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00907

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000916

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000441

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00143

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.000661

AC:

166

AN:

251222

AF XY:

0.000538

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00831

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000578

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000529

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000653

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000255

AC:

373

AN:

1461684

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000219

AC XY:

159

AN XY:

727160

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00843

AC:

282

AN:

33468

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000604

AC:

AN:

44722

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26128

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39688

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.0000464

AC:

AN:

86252

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53408

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.000694

AC:

AN:

5766

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000180

AC:

AN:

1111864

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000596

AC:

AN:

60388

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.479

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00261

AC:

397

AN:

152334

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00246

AC XY:

183

AN XY:

74488

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00907

AC:

377

AN:

41582

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000915

AC:

AN:

15300

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3470

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5188

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4822

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10616

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000441

AC:

AN:

68036

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00142

AC:

AN:

2114

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.497

Heterozygous variant carriers

112

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.00114

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00268

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000577

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.000109

EpiControl

AF:

0.000178

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:5

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:2

Oct 07, 2014

GeneDx

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Apr 08, 2024

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Brugada syndrome 4

Benign:2

Dec 27, 2024

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Feb 23, 2022

Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Cardiovascular phenotype

Benign:1

Nov 05, 2015

Ambry Genetics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.46

CADD

Benign

8.7

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.87

PhyloP100

2.7

Mutation Taster

=94/6

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.080

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over