rs1555120997
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely pathogenic. The variant received 8 ACMG points: 8P and 0B. PM2PM5PP3_Strong
The NM_000051.4(ATM):c.7013T>A(p.Leu2338Gln) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000000684 in 1,461,738 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. L2338P) has been classified as Likely pathogenic.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000051.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_pathogenic. The variant received 8 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ATM | NM_000051.4 | c.7013T>A | p.Leu2338Gln | missense_variant | Exon 48 of 63 | ENST00000675843.1 | NP_000042.3 |
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ATM | ENST00000675843.1 | c.7013T>A | p.Leu2338Gln | missense_variant | Exon 48 of 63 | NM_000051.4 | ENSP00000501606.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome AF: 6.84e-7 AC: 1AN: 1461738Hom.: 0 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.00000138 AC XY: 1AN XY: 727184 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:1
The p.L2338Q variant (also known as c.7013T>A), located in coding exon 47 of the ATM gene, results from a T to A substitution at nucleotide position 7013. The leucine at codon 2338 is replaced by glutamine, an amino acid with dissimilar properties. This amino acid position is highly conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, this alteration is predicted to be deleterious by in silico analysis. Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at