rs1555230404
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 1 ACMG points: 2P and 1B. PM2BP4
The ENST00000320574.10(POLE):c.167C>T(p.Pro56Leu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. P56S) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
ENST00000320574.10 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 1 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
POLE | NM_006231.4 | c.167C>T | p.Pro56Leu | missense_variant | 2/49 | ENST00000320574.10 | NP_006222.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
POLE | ENST00000320574.10 | c.167C>T | p.Pro56Leu | missense_variant | 2/49 | 1 | NM_006231.4 | ENSP00000322570 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 31
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Dec 02, 2023 | This sequence change replaces proline, which is neutral and non-polar, with leucine, which is neutral and non-polar, at codon 56 of the POLE protein (p.Pro56Leu). This variant is not present in population databases (gnomAD no frequency). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with POLE-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 473478). Advanced modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) performed at Invitae indicates that this missense variant is not expected to disrupt POLE protein function with a negative predictive value of 80%. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jan 10, 2023 | Not observed in large population cohorts (gnomAD); In silico analysis, which includes protein predictors and evolutionary conservation, supports a deleterious effect; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge - |
not specified Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Oct 18, 2018 | The p.Pro56Leu variant in POLE has not been reported in the literature in indivi duals with hereditary colorectal cancer, but has been reported by other clinical laboratories in ClinVar (Variation ID: 473478). This variant was absent from la rge population databases. Computational prediction tools and conservation analys is do not provide strong support for or against an impact to the protein. In sum mary, the clinical significance of the p.Pro56Leu variant is uncertain. ACMG/AMP Criteria applied: PM2. - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Jun 27, 2021 | The p.P56L variant (also known as c.167C>T), located in coding exon 2 of the POLE gene, results from a C to T substitution at nucleotide position 167. The proline at codon 56 is replaced by leucine, an amino acid with similar properties. This amino acid position is conserved. In addition, this alteration is predicted to be tolerated by in silico analysis. Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at