rs1555533416
Variant summary
Our verdict is Pathogenic. The variant received 10 ACMG points: 10P and 0B. PVS1PM2
The NM_001042492.3(NF1):c.5268+2T>A variant causes a splice donor, intron change. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predicting alterations to normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001042492.3 splice_donor, intron
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- neurofibromatosis type 1Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen, PanelApp Australia, G2P, Genomics England PanelApp
- neurofibromatosis-Noonan syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, Genomics England PanelApp, PanelApp Australia
- Moyamoya diseaseInheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
- hereditary pheochromocytoma-paragangliomaInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- familial ovarian cancerInheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Pathogenic. The variant received 10 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 31
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome;CN230736:Cardiovascular phenotype Uncertain:1
The c.5205+2T>A intronic variant results from a T to A substitution two nucleotides after coding exon 36 in the NF1 gene. This nucleotide position is well conserved in available vertebrate species. In silico splice site analysis predicts that this alteration will weaken the native splice donor site; however, direct evidence is insufficient at this time (Ambry internal data). Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at