rs17136898
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP4_StrongBA1
The ENST00000682710.1(UMAD1):c.82+60757T>C variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.134 in 152,070 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1,357 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar.
Frequency
Consequence
ENST00000682710.1 intron
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: ENST00000682710.1. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UMAD1 | NM_001302348.2 | MANE Select | c.82+60757T>C | intron | N/A | NP_001289277.1 | |||
| UMAD1 | NM_001302349.2 | c.82+60757T>C | intron | N/A | NP_001289278.1 | ||||
| UMAD1 | NM_001302350.2 | c.-24+58002T>C | intron | N/A | NP_001289279.1 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UMAD1 | ENST00000682710.1 | MANE Select | c.82+60757T>C | intron | N/A | ENSP00000507605.1 | |||
| UMAD1 | ENST00000636849.1 | TSL:5 | c.82+60757T>C | intron | N/A | ENSP00000489648.1 | |||
| UMAD1 | ENST00000482067.3 | TSL:5 | c.82+60757T>C | intron | N/A | ENSP00000490046.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.134 AC: 20362AN: 151950Hom.: 1354 Cov.: 31 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.134 AC: 20397AN: 152070Hom.: 1357 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.133 AC XY: 9854AN XY: 74370 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at