rs17512439

Positions:

• chr14-102015227-G-A

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -18 ACMG points: 0P and 18B. BP4_Moderate BP6_Very_Strong BS1 BS2

The NM_001376.5(DYNC1H1):​c.7137G>A​(p.Leu2379Leu) variant causes a synonymous change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0016 in 1,614,210 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 43 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

• Frequency:
  • Genomes: 𝑓 0.0088 (20 hom., cov: 32)
  • Exomes 𝑓: 0.00084 (23 hom.)
• Consequence: DYNC1H1 NM_001376.5 synonymous
• Clinical Significance: Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:14
• Conservation: PhyloP100: 6.65

Genes affected

DYNC1H1 (HGNC:2961): (dynein cytoplasmic 1 heavy chain 1) Dyneins are a group of microtubule-activated ATPases that function as molecular motors. They are divided into two subgroups of axonemal and cytoplasmic dyneins. The cytoplasmic dyneins function in intracellular motility, including retrograde axonal transport, protein sorting, organelle movement, and spindle dynamics. Molecules of conventional cytoplasmic dynein are comprised of 2 heavy chain polypeptides and a number of intermediate and light chains.This gene encodes a member of the cytoplasmic dynein heavy chain family. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2008]

DYNC1H1 (HGNC:):

ACMG classification

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -18 ACMG points.

• BP4: Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.33).
• BP6: Variant 14-102015227-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr14-102015227-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 128940.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr14-102015227-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
• BS1: Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0088 (1341/152318) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0307 (1278/41566). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0293. There are 20 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 673 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
• BS2: High AC in GnomAd4 at 1341 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	Protein	UniProt
DYNC1H1	NM_001376.5	c.7137G>A	p.Leu2379Leu	synonymous_variant	35/78	ENST00000360184.10	NP_001367.2

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
DYNC1H1	ENST00000360184.10	c.7137G>A	p.Leu2379Leu	synonymous_variant	35/78	1	NM_001376.5	ENSP00000348965.4

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00881 AC: 1341 AN: 152200 Hom.: 20 Cov.: 32

Gnomad AFR AF: 0.0308

Gnomad AMI AF: 0.00

Gnomad AMR AF: 0.00334

Gnomad ASJ AF: 0.00

Gnomad EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad SAS AF: 0.000207

Gnomad FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad MID AF: 0.00

Gnomad NFE AF: 0.0000294

Gnomad OTH AF: 0.00431

GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00242 AC: 609 AN: 251462 Hom.: 8 AF XY: 0.00170 AC XY: 231 AN XY: 135916

Gnomad AFR exome AF: 0.0315

Gnomad AMR exome AF: 0.00228

Gnomad ASJ exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad EAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad SAS exome AF: 0.0000980

Gnomad FIN exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad NFE exome AF: 0.0000967

Gnomad OTH exome AF: 0.000651

GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000844 AC: 1234 AN: 1461892 Hom.: 23 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000723 AC XY: 526 AN XY: 727246

Gnomad4 AFR exome AF: 0.0287

Gnomad4 AMR exome AF: 0.00221

Gnomad4 ASJ exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome AF: 0.0000504

Gnomad4 SAS exome AF: 0.0000696

Gnomad4 FIN exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome AF: 0.0000531

Gnomad4 OTH exome AF: 0.00164

GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00880 AC: 1341 AN: 152318 Hom.: 20 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00904 AC XY: 673 AN XY: 74478

Gnomad4 AFR AF: 0.0307

Gnomad4 AMR AF: 0.00333

Gnomad4 ASJ AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 SAS AF: 0.000207

Gnomad4 FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 NFE AF: 0.0000294

Gnomad4 OTH AF: 0.00426

Alfa AF: 0.00467 Hom.: 2

Bravo AF: 0.00991

Asia WGS AF: 0.00115 AC: 4 AN: 3478

EpiCase AF: 0.000218

EpiControl AF: 0.000237

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:14

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:5

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences	-	- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Athena Diagnostics	Oct 16, 2020	- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided	clinical testing	Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago	-	Likely benign based on allele frequency in 1000 Genomes Project or ESP global frequency and its presence in a patient with a rare or unrelated disease phenotype. NOT Sanger confirmed. -
Benign, no assertion criteria provided	clinical testing	Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center	-	- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	GeneDx	Jan 27, 2016	This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

not provided Benign:3

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories	Mar 04, 2021	- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	not provided	Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics	-	- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided	clinical testing	Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center	-	- -

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease axonal type 2O Benign:2

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina	Jan 13, 2018	This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp	Feb 01, 2024	- -

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Molecular Genetics Laboratory, London Health Sciences Centre

-

- -

Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Ambry Genetics

Jul 11, 2016

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease axonal type 2O;C3281202:Intellectual disability, autosomal dominant 13;C5780022:Autosomal dominant childhood-onset proximal spinal muscular atrophy without contractures Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics

Aug 06, 2021

- -

Autosomal dominant cerebellar ataxia Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 13, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
BayesDel_noAF	Benign	-0.33
CADD	Benign	11
DANN	Benign	0.73
RBP_binding_hub_radar		0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar		1.7

Splicing

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)		0.030		Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs17512439; hg19: chr14-102481564;