Menu
GeneBe

rs189991547

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points: 0P and 4B. BP4_ModerateBP6BP7

The NM_000218.3(KCNQ1):c.811C>T(p.Leu271=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000485 in 1,613,834 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00040 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00049 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

KCNQ1
NM_000218.3 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:3B:11

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.49
Variant links:
Genes affected
KCNQ1 (HGNC:6294): (potassium voltage-gated channel subfamily Q member 1) This gene encodes a voltage-gated potassium channel required for repolarization phase of the cardiac action potential. This protein can form heteromultimers with two other potassium channel proteins, KCNE1 and KCNE3. Mutations in this gene are associated with hereditary long QT syndrome 1 (also known as Romano-Ward syndrome), Jervell and Lange-Nielsen syndrome, and familial atrial fibrillation. This gene exhibits tissue-specific imprinting, with preferential expression from the maternal allele in some tissues, and biallelic expression in others. This gene is located in a region of chromosome 11 amongst other imprinted genes that are associated with Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome (BWS), and itself has been shown to be disrupted by chromosomal rearrangements in patients with BWS. Alternatively spliced transcript variants have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2011]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.36).
BP6
Variant 11-2572876-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-2572876-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 138001.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=4, Benign=4, Uncertain_significance=3}. Variant chr11-2572876-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr11-2572876-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=1.49 with no splicing effect.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
KCNQ1NM_000218.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.811C>T p.Leu271= synonymous_variant 6/16 ENST00000155840.12

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
KCNQ1ENST00000155840.12 linkuse as main transcriptc.811C>T p.Leu271= synonymous_variant 6/161 NM_000218.3 P1P51787-1
KCNQ1ENST00000335475.6 linkuse as main transcriptc.430C>T p.Leu144= synonymous_variant 6/161 P51787-2
KCNQ1ENST00000496887.7 linkuse as main transcriptc.550C>T p.Leu184= synonymous_variant 7/165
KCNQ1ENST00000646564.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.478-10559C>T intron_variant

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000401
AC:
61
AN:
152262
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000241
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000262
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00749
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000426
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000478
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000655
AC:
164
AN:
250490
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000722
AC XY:
98
AN XY:
135720
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0000620
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000261
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00847
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.000229
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000486
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00115
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000493
AC:
721
AN:
1461454
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000497
AC XY:
361
AN XY:
727048
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0000597
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000313
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00758
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.000139
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0000189
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000388
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000861
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000400
AC:
61
AN:
152380
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.000376
AC XY:
28
AN XY:
74524
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0000240
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000261
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00749
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000426
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.000473
Alfa
AF:
0.00105
Hom.:
1
Bravo
AF:
0.000457
EpiCase
AF:
0.000981
EpiControl
AF:
0.00113

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:3Benign:11
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:3
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxJan 23, 2013This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineJan 29, 2016p.Leu271Leu in Exon 06 of KCNQ1: This variant is not expected to have clinical s ignificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue, is not located with in the splice consensus sequence, and has been identified in 62/65706 European c hromosomes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.broadinstitute .org; dbSNP rs189991547). -
not provided Benign:3
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenMar 01, 2024KCNQ1: BP4, BP7 -
Long QT syndrome Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 31, 2024- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAll of Us Research Program, National Institutes of HealthFeb 05, 2024- -
Long QT syndrome 1 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
Atrial fibrillation, familial, 3 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
Jervell and Lange-Nielsen syndrome 1 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
Short QT syndrome type 2 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsSep 21, 2017This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Cardiac arrhythmia Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthMay 21, 2018- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.36
Cadd
Benign
11
Dann
Benign
0.79

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.010
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs189991547; hg19: chr11-2594106; COSMIC: COSV50109077; API