rs192662552
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2
The NM_004612.4(TGFBR1):āc.1032T>Cā(p.Asn344=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00024 in 1,614,048 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (ā ā ).
Frequency
Genomes: š 0.00025 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes š: 0.00024 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
TGFBR1
NM_004612.4 synonymous
NM_004612.4 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 1.58
Genes affected
TGFBR1 (HGNC:11772): (transforming growth factor beta receptor 1) The protein encoded by this gene forms a heteromeric complex with type II TGF-beta receptors when bound to TGF-beta, transducing the TGF-beta signal from the cell surface to the cytoplasm. The encoded protein is a serine/threonine protein kinase. Mutations in this gene have been associated with Loeys-Dietz aortic aneurysm syndrome (LDAS). Multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.
BP4
?
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.49).
BP6
?
Variant 9-99144790-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr9-99144790-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 45093.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
?
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=1.58 with no splicing effect.
BS1
?
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000249 (38/152342) while in subpopulation EAS AF= 0.00694 (36/5186). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00515. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 18 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
?
High AC in GnomAd4 at 38 AD gene.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TGFBR1 | NM_004612.4 | c.1032T>C | p.Asn344= | synonymous_variant | 6/9 | ENST00000374994.9 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TGFBR1 | ENST00000374994.9 | c.1032T>C | p.Asn344= | synonymous_variant | 6/9 | 1 | NM_004612.4 | P4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? AF: 0.000250 AC: 38AN: 152224Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
?
AF:
AC:
38
AN:
152224
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000649 AC: 163AN: 251086Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000597 AC XY: 81AN XY: 135714
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
163
AN:
251086
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
81
AN XY:
135714
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000239 AC: 350AN: 1461706Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000210 AC XY: 153AN XY: 727154
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
350
AN:
1461706
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
153
AN XY:
727154
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome ? AF: 0.000249 AC: 38AN: 152342Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000242 AC XY: 18AN XY: 74506
GnomAD4 genome
?
AF:
AC:
38
AN:
152342
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
18
AN XY:
74506
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
6
AN:
3478
ClinVar
Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:9
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Familial thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Apr 13, 2018 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Sep 14, 2015 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Jan 17, 2024 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jun 14, 2016 | - - |
Loeys-Dietz syndrome Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health | Feb 05, 2024 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jun 14, 2016 | - - |
not specified Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Jun 07, 2009 | - - |
Loeys-Dietz syndrome 1 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jun 14, 2016 | - - |
not provided Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Sep 11, 2020 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at