rs199472753
Variant summary
Our verdict is Pathogenic. Variant got 10 ACMG points: 10P and 0B. PM1PM2PM5PP3_Strong
The NM_000218.3(KCNQ1):c.958C>G(p.Pro320Ala) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as not provided (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. P320H) has been classified as Likely pathogenic.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000218.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Pathogenic. Variant got 10 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KCNQ1 | NM_000218.3 | c.958C>G | p.Pro320Ala | missense_variant | 7/16 | ENST00000155840.12 | NP_000209.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KCNQ1 | ENST00000155840.12 | c.958C>G | p.Pro320Ala | missense_variant | 7/16 | 1 | NM_000218.3 | ENSP00000155840 | P1 | |
KCNQ1 | ENST00000335475.6 | c.577C>G | p.Pro193Ala | missense_variant | 7/16 | 1 | ENSP00000334497 | |||
KCNQ1 | ENST00000496887.7 | c.697C>G | p.Pro233Ala | missense_variant | 8/16 | 5 | ENSP00000434560 | |||
KCNQ1 | ENST00000646564.2 | c.514C>G | p.Pro172Ala | missense_variant | 3/11 | ENSP00000495806 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 33
GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 31
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 33
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Congenital long QT syndrome Other:1
not provided, no classification provided | literature only | Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Unit, Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust | - | This variant has been reported as associated with Long QT syndrome in the following publications (PMID:9386136;PMID:19540844). This is a literature report, and does not necessarily reflect the clinical interpretation of the Imperial College / Royal Brompton Cardiovascular Genetics laboratory. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at