rs199705789
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -1 ACMG points: 3P and 4B. PM2PP2BP4_Strong
The NM_001267550.2(TTN):c.40414C>A(p.Pro13472Thr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000192 in 1,564,868 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001267550.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -1 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TTN | NM_001267550.2 | c.40414C>A | p.Pro13472Thr | missense_variant | 218/363 | ENST00000589042.5 | NP_001254479.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TTN | ENST00000589042.5 | c.40414C>A | p.Pro13472Thr | missense_variant | 218/363 | 5 | NM_001267550.2 | ENSP00000467141.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00000658 AC: 1AN: 151954Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000142 AC: 2AN: 1412914Hom.: 0 Cov.: 29 AF XY: 0.00000286 AC XY: 2AN XY: 700182
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00000658 AC: 1AN: 151954Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 74208
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:3
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | research | Biesecker Lab/Clinical Genomics Section, National Institutes of Health | Jun 24, 2013 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | May 31, 2018 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Revvity Omics, Revvity | Nov 22, 2019 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at