rs200901713

chr14-102049590-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_Strong BP6 BS1 BS2

The NM_001376.5(DYNC1H1):c.13515+8C>T variant causes a splice region, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000744 in 1,613,708 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 2/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

• Frequency:
  • Genomes: 𝑓 0.000085 (0 hom., cov: 32)
  • Exomes 𝑓: 0.000073 (0 hom.)
• Consequence: DYNC1H1 NM_001376.5 splice_region, intron
• Scores: Splicing: ADA: 0.00002238
• Clinical Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:2 B:3
• Conservation: PhyloP100: -3.23

Genes affected

DYNC1H1 (HGNC:2961): (dynein cytoplasmic 1 heavy chain 1) Dyneins are a group of microtubule-activated ATPases that function as molecular motors. They are divided into two subgroups of axonemal and cytoplasmic dyneins. The cytoplasmic dyneins function in intracellular motility, including retrograde axonal transport, protein sorting, organelle movement, and spindle dynamics. Molecules of conventional cytoplasmic dynein are comprised of 2 heavy chain polypeptides and a number of intermediate and light chains.This gene encodes a member of the cytoplasmic dynein heavy chain family. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2008]

(HGNC:):

ACMG classification

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.

• BP4: Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.8).
• BP6: Variant 14-102049590-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr14-102049590-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 312665.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=3, Uncertain_significance=2}.
• BS1: Variant frequency is greater than expected in population mid. gnomad4_exome allele frequency = 0.0000732 (107/1461550) while in subpopulation MID AF= 0.000347 (2/5768). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0000609. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4_exome. There are 59 alleles in male gnomad4_exome subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
• BS2: High AC in GnomAd at 13 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	UniProt
DYNC1H1	NM_001376.5	c.13515+8C>T		splice_region_variant, intron_variant		ENST00000360184.10

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Appris	UniProt
DYNC1H1	ENST00000360184.10	c.13515+8C>T		splice_region_variant, intron_variant		1	NM_001376.5	P1
	ENST00000553701.1	n.346+855G>A		intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant		3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000854 AC: 13 AN: 152158 Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32

Gnomad AFR AF: 0.0000483

Gnomad AMI AF: 0.00

Gnomad AMR AF: 0.00

Gnomad ASJ AF: 0.00259

Gnomad EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad SAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad MID AF: 0.00

Gnomad NFE AF: 0.0000294

Gnomad OTH AF: 0.00

GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000996 AC: 25 AN: 251042 Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000884 AC XY: 12 AN XY: 135738

Gnomad AFR exome AF: 0.0000616

Gnomad AMR exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome AF: 0.00228

Gnomad EAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad SAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad FIN exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad NFE exome AF: 0.00000880

Gnomad OTH exome AF: 0.00

GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000732 AC: 107 AN: 1461550 Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000811 AC XY: 59 AN XY: 727068

Gnomad4 AFR exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 AMR exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ exome AF: 0.00287

Gnomad4 EAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome AF: 0.0000232

Gnomad4 FIN exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome AF: 0.0000135

Gnomad4 OTH exome AF: 0.000215

GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000854 AC: 13 AN: 152158 Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000807 AC XY: 6 AN XY: 74324

Gnomad4 AFR AF: 0.0000483

Gnomad4 AMR AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ AF: 0.00259

Gnomad4 EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 SAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 NFE AF: 0.0000294

Gnomad4 OTH AF: 0.00

Alfa AF: 0.000158 Hom.: 0

Bravo AF: 0.0000718

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:2 Benign:3

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

Submissions by phenotype

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease axonal type 2O Uncertain:1 Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Invitae	Dec 13, 2023	- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina	Jan 13, 2018	This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Autosomal dominant cerebellar ataxia Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 13, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

not provided Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

GeneDx

May 04, 2018

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

DYNC1H1-related disorder Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Jan 08, 2024

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
BayesDel_noAF	Benign	-0.80
Cadd	Benign	11
Dann	Benign	0.56
RBP_binding_hub_radar		0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar		1.0

Splicing

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
dbscSNV1_ADA	Benign	0.000022
dbscSNV1_RF	Benign	0.042
SpliceAI score (max)		0.58		Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
DS_DG_spliceai		0.58		Position offset: -2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs200901713; hg19: chr14-102515927;