rs201023432
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -1 ACMG points: 0P and 1B. BP4
The NM_001267550.2(TTN):āc.96989T>Cā(p.Ile32330Thr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000221 in 1,613,702 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. I32330I) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001267550.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -1 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TTN | NM_001267550.2 | c.96989T>C | p.Ile32330Thr | missense_variant | Exon 348 of 363 | ENST00000589042.5 | NP_001254479.2 |
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TTN | ENST00000589042.5 | c.96989T>C | p.Ile32330Thr | missense_variant | Exon 348 of 363 | 5 | NM_001267550.2 | ENSP00000467141.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000854 AC: 13AN: 152156Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000606 AC: 15AN: 247660 AF XY: 0.0000521 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000235 AC: 343AN: 1461546Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000224 AC XY: 163AN XY: 727046 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000854 AC: 13AN: 152156Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000673 AC XY: 5AN XY: 74312 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:4
not specified Uncertain:1
Variant summary: TTN c.89285T>C (p.Ile29762Thr) results in a non-conservative amino acid change located in the A-band region of the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 6.1e-05 in 247660 control chromosomes. This frequency is not significantly higher than estimated for a pathogenic variant in TTN causing Dilated Cardiomyopathy (6.1e-05 vs 0.00039), allowing no conclusion about variant significance. c.89285T>C has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with Dilated Cardiomyopathy and hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy without strong evidence for causality (examples, Lopes_2013, Mazzarotto_2020). These report(s) do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Dilated Cardiomyopathy. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. The following publications have been ascertained in the context of this evaluation (PMID: 23396983, 31983221). Seven submitters have cited clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 (VUS, n=6; Likely benign, n=1). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as uncertain significance.
Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2J;C1858763:Dilated cardiomyopathy 1G Uncertain:1
Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2J;C1838244:Tibial muscular dystrophy;C1858763:Dilated cardiomyopathy 1G;C1861065:Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 9;C1863599:Myopathy, myofibrillar, 9, with early respiratory failure;C2673677:Early-onset myopathy with fatal cardiomyopathy Uncertain:1
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity.
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at