rs201817995

chr14-102027780-G-A

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_Strong BP6 BP7 BS1 BS2

The NM_001376.5(DYNC1H1):c.9210G>A(p.Pro3070=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000304 in 1,614,066 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

• Frequency:
  • Genomes: 𝑓 0.000013 (0 hom., cov: 32)
  • Exomes 𝑓: 0.000032 (0 hom.)
• Consequence: DYNC1H1 NM_001376.5 synonymous
• Clinical Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:2 B:2
• Conservation: PhyloP100: -1.79

Genes affected

DYNC1H1 (HGNC:2961): (dynein cytoplasmic 1 heavy chain 1) Dyneins are a group of microtubule-activated ATPases that function as molecular motors. They are divided into two subgroups of axonemal and cytoplasmic dyneins. The cytoplasmic dyneins function in intracellular motility, including retrograde axonal transport, protein sorting, organelle movement, and spindle dynamics. Molecules of conventional cytoplasmic dynein are comprised of 2 heavy chain polypeptides and a number of intermediate and light chains.This gene encodes a member of the cytoplasmic dynein heavy chain family. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2008]

ACMG classification

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points.

• BP4: Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.7).
• BP6: Variant 14-102027780-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr14-102027780-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 312644.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=2, Uncertain_significance=2}.
• BP7: Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-1.79 with no splicing effect.
• BS1: Variant frequency is greater than expected in population mid. gnomad4_exome allele frequency = 0.0000322 (47/1461894) while in subpopulation MID AF= 0.000693 (4/5768). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000236. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4_exome. There are 19 alleles in male gnomad4_exome subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
• BS2: High AC in GnomAdExome at 6 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	UniProt
DYNC1H1	NM_001376.5	c.9210G>A	p.Pro3070=	synonymous_variant	47/78	ENST00000360184.10

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Appris	UniProt
DYNC1H1	ENST00000360184.10	c.9210G>A	p.Pro3070=	synonymous_variant	47/78	1	NM_001376.5	P1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000131 AC: 2 AN: 152172 Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32

Gnomad AFR AF: 0.00

Gnomad AMI AF: 0.00

Gnomad AMR AF: 0.00

Gnomad ASJ AF: 0.00

Gnomad EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad SAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad MID AF: 0.00

Gnomad NFE AF: 0.0000294

Gnomad OTH AF: 0.00

GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000239 AC: 6 AN: 251458 Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000221 AC XY: 3 AN XY: 135906

Gnomad AFR exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad AMR exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad EAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad SAS exome AF: 0.0000327

Gnomad FIN exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad NFE exome AF: 0.0000352

Gnomad OTH exome AF: 0.000163

GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000322 AC: 47 AN: 1461894 Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000261 AC XY: 19 AN XY: 727248

Gnomad4 AFR exome AF: 0.0000597

Gnomad4 AMR exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome AF: 0.0000252

Gnomad4 SAS exome AF: 0.0000464

Gnomad4 FIN exome AF: 0.0000187

Gnomad4 NFE exome AF: 0.0000261

Gnomad4 OTH exome AF: 0.0000993

GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000131 AC: 2 AN: 152172 Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000269 AC XY: 2 AN XY: 74346

Gnomad4 AFR AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 AMR AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 SAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 NFE AF: 0.0000294

Gnomad4 OTH AF: 0.00

Alfa AF: 0.0000474 Hom.: 0

Bravo AF: 0.0000113

EpiCase AF: 0.0000545

EpiControl AF: 0.00

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:2 Benign:2

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

Submissions by phenotype

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease axonal type 2O Uncertain:1 Benign:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina	Jan 12, 2018	This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Invitae	Jan 13, 2024	- -

Autosomal dominant cerebellar ataxia Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 12, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

not provided Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

GeneDx

Dec 16, 2020

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
BayesDel_noAF	Benign	-0.70
Cadd	Benign	1.5
Dann	Benign	0.65
RBP_binding_hub_radar		0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar		1.7

Splicing

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)		0.0		Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs201817995; hg19: chr14-102494117;