rs202148988
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points: 2P and 4B. PM2BP4_Strong
The NM_000553.6(WRN):c.16T>A(p.Leu6Met) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000372 in 1,613,122 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000553.6 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WRN | NM_000553.6 | c.16T>A | p.Leu6Met | missense_variant | 2/35 | ENST00000298139.7 | NP_000544.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WRN | ENST00000298139.7 | c.16T>A | p.Leu6Met | missense_variant | 2/35 | 1 | NM_000553.6 | ENSP00000298139 | P1 | |
WRN | ENST00000650667.1 | c.16T>A | p.Leu6Met | missense_variant, NMD_transcript_variant | 2/34 | ENSP00000498593 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152112Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00000799 AC: 2AN: 250434Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.00000739 AC XY: 1AN XY: 135362
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000342 AC: 5AN: 1461010Hom.: 0 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.00000275 AC XY: 2AN XY: 726756
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152112Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 74314
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Werner syndrome Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Mar 09, 2022 | This sequence change replaces leucine, which is neutral and non-polar, with methionine, which is neutral and non-polar, at codon 6 of the WRN protein (p.Leu6Met). The frequency data for this variant in the population databases is considered unreliable, as metrics indicate poor data quality at this position in the gnomAD database. This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with WRN-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 528099). Algorithms developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function output the following: SIFT: "Not Available"; PolyPhen-2: "Benign"; Align-GVGD: "Not Available". The methionine amino acid residue is found in multiple mammalian species, which suggests that this missense change does not adversely affect protein function. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at