rs2230027

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_000443.4(ABCB4):​c.459T>C​(p.Phe153Phe) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00288 in 1,614,072 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 121 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.015 ( 61 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0016 ( 60 hom. )

Consequence

ABCB4
NM_000443.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:6

Conservation

PhyloP100: 3.00

Publications

6 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
ABCB4 (HGNC:45): (ATP binding cassette subfamily B member 4) The membrane-associated protein encoded by this gene is a member of the superfamily of ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters. ABC proteins transport various molecules across extra- and intra-cellular membranes. ABC genes are divided into seven distinct subfamilies (ABC1, MDR/TAP, MRP, ALD, OABP, GCN20, White). This protein is a member of the MDR/TAP subfamily. Members of the MDR/TAP subfamily are involved in multidrug resistance as well as antigen presentation. This gene encodes a full transporter and member of the p-glycoprotein family of membrane proteins with phosphatidylcholine as its substrate. The function of this protein has not yet been determined; however, it may involve transport of phospholipids from liver hepatocytes into bile. Alternative splicing of this gene results in several products of undetermined function. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
ABCB4 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis type 3
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen, Orphanet
  • gallbladder disease 1
    Inheritance: SD, AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet
  • pancreatitis
    Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.5).
BP6
Variant 7-87453021-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr7-87453021-A-G is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 256165.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=3 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.0506 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
ABCB4NM_000443.4 linkc.459T>C p.Phe153Phe synonymous_variant Exon 6 of 28 ENST00000649586.2 NP_000434.1 P21439-2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
ABCB4ENST00000649586.2 linkc.459T>C p.Phe153Phe synonymous_variant Exon 6 of 28 NM_000443.4 ENSP00000496956.2 P21439-2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0150
AC:
2289
AN:
152106
Hom.:
60
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0522
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00537
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000415
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0158
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000250
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0100
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00411
AC:
1033
AN:
251364
AF XY:
0.00308
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0534
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00339
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0000462
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000229
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00293
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00160
AC:
2337
AN:
1461848
Hom.:
60
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
0.00138
AC XY:
1004
AN XY:
727220
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0520
AC:
1740
AN:
33476
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00391
AC:
175
AN:
44714
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
26134
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39692
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000139
AC:
12
AN:
86258
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0000187
AC:
1
AN:
53416
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00347
AC:
20
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000180
AC:
200
AN:
1111994
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00313
AC:
189
AN:
60396
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.469
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
133
265
398
530
663
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
58
116
174
232
290
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0151
AC:
2306
AN:
152224
Hom.:
61
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0145
AC XY:
1081
AN XY:
74418
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0525
AC:
2179
AN:
41522
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00536
AC:
82
AN:
15286
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5184
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000415
AC:
2
AN:
4818
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10608
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0170
AC:
5
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000250
AC:
17
AN:
68014
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00992
AC:
21
AN:
2116
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.501
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
111
222
334
445
556
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
26
52
78
104
130
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00640
Hom.:
50
Bravo
AF:
0.0168
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00404
AC:
14
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.000218
EpiControl
AF:
0.00

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:6
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:2
-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Mar 17, 2016
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

not provided Benign:2
Jan 23, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Cholestasis, intrahepatic, of pregnancy, 3 Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis type 3 Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.50
CADD
Benign
12
DANN
Benign
0.72
PhyloP100
3.0
Mutation Taster
=99/1
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs2230027; hg19: chr7-87082337; API