rs2230598

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_004431.5(EPHA2):c.2034A>G(p.Leu678Leu) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00623 in 1,613,644 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 520 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.033 ( 262 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0034 ( 258 hom. )

Consequence

EPHA2
NM_004431.5 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:4

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.501

Variant links:

Genes affected

EPHA2 (HGNC:3386): (EPH receptor A2) This gene belongs to the ephrin receptor subfamily of the protein-tyrosine kinase family. EPH and EPH-related receptors have been implicated in mediating developmental events, particularly in the nervous system. Receptors in the EPH subfamily typically have a single kinase domain and an extracellular region containing a Cys-rich domain and 2 fibronectin type III repeats. The ephrin receptors are divided into 2 groups based on the similarity of their extracellular domain sequences and their affinities for binding ephrin-A and ephrin-B ligands. This gene encodes a protein that binds ephrin-A ligands. Mutations in this gene are the cause of certain genetically-related cataract disorders.[provided by RefSeq, May 2010]

EPHA2 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.62).

BP6

Variant 1-16133199-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-16133199-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 293415.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.501 with no splicing effect.

BA1

GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.111 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
EPHA2	NM_004431.5 link	c.2034A>G	p.Leu678Leu	synonymous_variant	Exon 11 of 17	ENST00000358432.8	NP_004422.2	P29317-1A0A024QZA8

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
EPHA2	ENST00000358432.8 link	c.2034A>G	p.Leu678Leu	synonymous_variant	Exon 11 of 17	1	NM_004431.5	ENSP00000351209.5		P29317-1
EPHA2	ENST00000462805.1 link	n.252A>G		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	Exon 2 of 2	3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0331

AC:

5031

AN:

152042

Hom.:

260

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.113

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.0171

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000414

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00949

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000397

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.0263

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.00894

AC:

2242

AN:

250906

Hom.:

128

AF XY:

0.00642

AC XY:

871

AN XY:

135664

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.118

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00721

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.000229

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000291

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00473

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00342

AC:

4999

AN:

1461484

Hom.:

258

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00293

AC XY:

2130

AN XY:

727050

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.116

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00857

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.000174

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.000172

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00817

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0332

AC:

5052

AN:

152160

Hom.:

262

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0322

AC XY:

2396

AN XY:

74384

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.113

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.0171

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.000207

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.000397

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.0260

Alfa

AF:

0.0172

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0379

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00549

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.000382

EpiControl

AF:

0.000356

ClinVar

Significance: Benign

Submissions summary: Benign:4

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Benign:2

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: not provided

- -

May 31, 2018

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Cataract 6 multiple types

Benign:2

Oct 29, 2024

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.62

CADD

Benign

9.5

DANN

Benign

0.85

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over