dbSNP rs2441621: MIR1302-3:n.59T>G (chr2-113583038-A-C) – ACMG Classification: Likely_benign (-4 pts)

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -4 ACMG points: 0P and 4B. BP4_Strong

The ENST00000408128.1(MIR1302-3):n.59T>G variant causes a non coding transcript exon change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000027 ( 0 hom., cov: 79)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000021 ( 0 hom. )

Failed GnomAD Quality Control

Consequence

MIR1302-3
ENST00000408128.1 non_coding_transcript_exon

Scores

Clinical Significance

Not reported in ClinVar

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.21

Publications

4 publications found

Variant links:

COSMIC-nc: COSV58538736

Genes affected

MIR1302-3 (HGNC:35295): (microRNA 1302-3) microRNAs (miRNAs) are short (20-24 nt) non-coding RNAs that are involved in post-transcriptional regulation of gene expression in multicellular organisms by affecting both the stability and translation of mRNAs. miRNAs are transcribed by RNA polymerase II as part of capped and polyadenylated primary transcripts (pri-miRNAs) that can be either protein-coding or non-coding. The primary transcript is cleaved by the Drosha ribonuclease III enzyme to produce an approximately 70-nt stem-loop precursor miRNA (pre-miRNA), which is further cleaved by the cytoplasmic Dicer ribonuclease to generate the mature miRNA and antisense miRNA star (miRNA*) products. The mature miRNA is incorporated into a RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC), which recognizes target mRNAs through imperfect base pairing with the miRNA and most commonly results in translational inhibition or destabilization of the target mRNA. The RefSeq represents the predicted microRNA stem-loop. [provided by RefSeq, Sep 2009]

MIR1302-3 links:

ENSG00000287165 (HGNC:):

ENSG00000287165 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -4 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.9).

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	Effect	Exon rank
MIR1302-3	NR_031632.1 link	n.59T>G	non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	Exon 1 of 1
LOC124907875	XR_007087203.1 link	n.1009T>G	non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	Exon 1 of 2
LOC124907875	XR_007087204.1 link	n.993T>G	non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	Exon 1 of 3
MIR1302-3	unassigned_transcript_479	n.-14T>G	upstream_gene_variant

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	Effect	Exon rank	TSL
MIR1302-3	ENST00000408128.1 link	n.59T>G	non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	Exon 1 of 1	6
ENSG00000287165	ENST00000666960.2 link	n.1008T>G	non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	Exon 1 of 2
ENSG00000291134	ENST00000801450.1 link	n.421-5512A>C	intron_variant	Intron 4 of 12

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0000266

AC:

AN:

150248

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.000195

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000426

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000149

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.00000406

AC:

AN:

246298

AF XY:

0.00

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00000908

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

Data not reliable, filtered out with message: AS_VQSR

AF:

0.0000212

AC:

AN:

376604

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000280

AC XY:

AN XY:

214196

show subpopulations

⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD version 4 Exomes is significantly skewed from the expected value of 0.5.

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10390

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

36162

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.0000855

AC:

AN:

11698

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

13122

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

66518

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

31530

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

1212

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000369

AC:

AN:

189592

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

16380

⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD4 Exomes is highly skewed from 0.5 (p-value = 0), which strongly suggests a high chance of mosaicism in these individuals.

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.238

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

GnomAD4 genome

Data not reliable, filtered out with message: AS_VQSR

AF:

0.0000266

AC:

AN:

150364

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000408

AC XY:

AN XY:

73492

show subpopulations

⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD version 4 Genomes is significantly skewed from the expected value of 0.5.

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

41252

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

15090

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3420

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.000196

AC:

AN:

5106

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.000426

AC:

AN:

4690

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10508

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

290

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000149

AC:

AN:

67016

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

2084

⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD version 4 Genomes is significantly skewed from the expected value of 0.5. (p-value = 0), which strongly suggests a high chance of mosaicism in these individuals.

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.225

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.000337

Hom.:

ClinVar

Not reported in ClinVar

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.90

CADD

Benign

3.7

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.70

PhyloP100

-1.2

Mutation Taster

=100/0

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over