rs2890849
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6_ModerateBA1
The NM_002449.5(MSX2):c.*1176G>C variant causes a 3 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.802 in 152,444 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 49,905 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_002449.5 3_prime_UTR
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- craniosynostosis 2Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, G2P, PanelApp Australia, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen, Orphanet
- parietal foraminaInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, ClinGen
- parietal foramina with cleidocranial dysplasiaInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE, LIMITED Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, Orphanet
- parietal foramina 1Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -14 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.802 AC: 121852AN: 151890Hom.: 49736 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.828 AC: 361AN: 436Hom.: 151 Cov.: 0 AF XY: 0.840 AC XY: 220AN XY: 262 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.802 AC: 121919AN: 152008Hom.: 49754 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.807 AC XY: 59921AN XY: 74288 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Craniosynostosis 2 Benign:1
This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Parietal foramina 1 Benign:1
This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at