rs34668322

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_001122681.2(SH3BP2):c.1332G>A(p.Ser444Ser) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000576 in 1,589,610 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 4 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0030 ( 2 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00032 ( 2 hom. )

Consequence

SH3BP2
NM_001122681.2 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:3

Conservation

PhyloP100: -2.12

Variant links:

Genes affected

SH3BP2 (HGNC:10825): (SH3 domain binding protein 2) The protein encoded by this gene has an N-terminal pleckstrin homology (PH) domain, an SH3-binding proline-rich region, and a C-terminal SH2 domain. The protein binds to the SH3 domains of several proteins including the ABL1 and SYK protein tyrosine kinases , and functions as a cytoplasmic adaptor protein to positively regulate transcriptional activity in T, natural killer (NK), and basophilic cells. Mutations in this gene result in cherubism. Multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Mar 2009]

SH3BP2 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.82).

BP6

Variant 4-2831661-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr4-2831661-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 454492.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-2.12 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.003 (457/152254) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0105 (436/41534). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00968. There are 2 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 230 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 457 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
SH3BP2	NM_001122681.2 link	c.1332G>A	p.Ser444Ser	synonymous_variant	Exon 9 of 13	ENST00000503393.8	NP_001116153.1	P78314-1A0A384N6E5
SH3BP2	NM_001145856.2 link	c.1503G>A	p.Ser501Ser	synonymous_variant	Exon 9 of 13		NP_001139328.1	P78314-4
SH3BP2	NM_001145855.2 link	c.1416G>A	p.Ser472Ser	synonymous_variant	Exon 9 of 13		NP_001139327.1	P78314-3
SH3BP2	NM_003023.4 link	c.1332G>A	p.Ser444Ser	synonymous_variant	Exon 9 of 13		NP_003014.3	P78314-1A0A384N6E5

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
SH3BP2	ENST00000503393.8 link	c.1332G>A	p.Ser444Ser	synonymous_variant	Exon 9 of 13	1	NM_001122681.2	ENSP00000422168.3		P78314-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00299

AC:

455

AN:

152136

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0105

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00105

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000147

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00191

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000649

AC:

135

AN:

207880

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.000489

AC XY:

AN XY:

112548

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00984

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000386

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000224

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000378

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000319

AC:

459

AN:

1437356

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000300

AC XY:

214

AN XY:

713028

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.0105

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.000452

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.000183

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.0000480

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.0000118

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00111

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00300

AC:

457

AN:

152254

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00309

AC XY:

230

AN XY:

74442

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.0105

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00105

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.0000147

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00189

Alfa

AF:

0.00143

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00351

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000866

AC:

AN:

3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:3

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Fibrous dysplasia of jaw

Benign:2

Jan 13, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

not provided

Benign:1

Dec 11, 2018

GeneDx

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.82

CADD

Benign

0.016

DANN

Benign

0.49

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.7

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.050

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over