rs34924315

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -17 ACMG points: 0P and 17B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1

The NM_001369.3(DNAH5):​c.12465A>G​(p.Gln4155Gln) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000587 in 1,614,162 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0032 ( 1 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00031 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

DNAH5
NM_001369.3 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:5

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.437

Publications

0 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
DNAH5 (HGNC:2950): (dynein axonemal heavy chain 5) This gene encodes a dynein protein, which is part of a microtubule-associated motor protein complex consisting of heavy, light, and intermediate chains. This protein is an axonemal heavy chain dynein. It functions as a force-generating protein with ATPase activity, whereby the release of ADP is thought to produce the force-producing power stroke. Mutations in this gene cause primary ciliary dyskinesia type 3, as well as Kartagener syndrome, which are both diseases due to ciliary defects. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2009]
DNAH5 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • primary ciliary dyskinesia 3
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: PanelApp Australia, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, ClinGen
  • primary ciliary dyskinesia
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -17 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.58).
BP6
Variant 5-13718916-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr5-13718916-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 525508.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.437 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00325 (495/152338) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.0114 (475/41586). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0106. There are 1 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 224 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
DNAH5NM_001369.3 linkc.12465A>G p.Gln4155Gln synonymous_variant Exon 72 of 79 ENST00000265104.5 NP_001360.1 Q8TE73

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
DNAH5ENST00000265104.5 linkc.12465A>G p.Gln4155Gln synonymous_variant Exon 72 of 79 1 NM_001369.3 ENSP00000265104.4 Q8TE73
DNAH5ENST00000681290.1 linkc.12420A>G p.Gln4140Gln synonymous_variant Exon 72 of 79 ENSP00000505288.1 A0A7P0Z455

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00326
AC:
496
AN:
152220
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0115
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000720
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000735
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00191
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.000848
AC:
213
AN:
251194
AF XY:
0.000538
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0121
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000376
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000176
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000163
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000309
AC:
452
AN:
1461824
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
46
AF XY:
0.000259
AC XY:
188
AN XY:
727222
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0119
AC:
400
AN:
33478
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000380
AC:
17
AN:
44724
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
26136
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39696
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
86258
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
53420
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.000347
AC:
2
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00000540
AC:
6
AN:
1111950
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000447
AC:
27
AN:
60394
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.490
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
26
52
78
104
130
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
20
40
60
80
100
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00325
AC:
495
AN:
152338
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00301
AC XY:
224
AN XY:
74482
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0114
AC:
475
AN:
41586
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000719
AC:
11
AN:
15304
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5184
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4824
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10620
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000735
AC:
5
AN:
68026
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00189
AC:
4
AN:
2116
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.517
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
23
46
70
93
116
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
10
20
30
40
50
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00134
Hom.:
1
Bravo
AF:
0.00376
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000866
AC:
3
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:5
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Primary ciliary dyskinesia Benign:3
Jun 16, 2014
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Sep 16, 2020
Natera, Inc.
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:2
Dec 31, 2018
GeneDx
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

See Variant Classification Assertion Criteria. -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.58
CADD
Benign
7.2
DANN
Benign
0.41
PhyloP100
0.44
Mutation Taster
=98/2
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.010
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs34924315; hg19: chr5-13719025; API