rs35404804

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points: 0P and 19B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_020297.4(ABCC9):​c.3321C>T​(p.Ile1107=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00211 in 1,613,962 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 58 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.011 ( 29 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0012 ( 29 hom. )

Consequence

ABCC9
NM_020297.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:13

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.88
Variant links:
Genes affected
ABCC9 (HGNC:60): (ATP binding cassette subfamily C member 9) The protein encoded by this gene is a member of the superfamily of ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters. ABC proteins transport various molecules across extra- and intra-cellular membranes. ABC genes are divided into seven distinct subfamilies (ABC1, MDR/TAP, MRP, ALD, OABP, GCN20, White). This protein is a member of the MRP subfamily which is involved in multi-drug resistance. This protein is thought to form ATP-sensitive potassium channels in cardiac, skeletal, and vascular and non-vascular smooth muscle. Protein structure suggests a role as the drug-binding channel-modulating subunit of the extra-pancreatic ATP-sensitive potassium channels. Mutations in this gene are associated with cardiomyopathy dilated type 1O. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2011]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.42).
BP6
Variant 12-21842466-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr12-21842466-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 35632.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr12-21842466-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr12-21842466-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=1.88 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0112 (1699/152256) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.039 (1620/41536). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0374. There are 29 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 797 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 29 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
ABCC9NM_020297.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.3321C>T p.Ile1107= synonymous_variant 29/40 ENST00000261200.9 NP_064693.2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
ABCC9ENST00000261200.9 linkuse as main transcriptc.3321C>T p.Ile1107= synonymous_variant 29/405 NM_020297.4 ENSP00000261200 P4O60706-2
ENST00000539874.1 linkuse as main transcriptn.331+11272G>A intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant 3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0111
AC:
1696
AN:
152140
Hom.:
29
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0390
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00353
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000118
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00814
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00304
AC:
763
AN:
251378
Hom.:
17
AF XY:
0.00210
AC XY:
285
AN XY:
135858
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0418
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00173
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000106
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00196
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00117
AC:
1704
AN:
1461706
Hom.:
29
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.000981
AC XY:
713
AN XY:
727164
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0410
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00210
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000232
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000729
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00252
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0112
AC:
1699
AN:
152256
Hom.:
29
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0107
AC XY:
797
AN XY:
74464
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0390
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00353
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000118
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00806
Alfa
AF:
0.00314
Hom.:
10
Bravo
AF:
0.0131
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000866
AC:
3
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.000273
EpiControl
AF:
0.000415

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:13
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:4
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxMar 05, 2014This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineMay 19, 2009- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
not provided Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitternot providedBreakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesSep 20, 2023- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDiagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen-- -
Dilated cardiomyopathy 1O Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpJan 31, 2024- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -
Cardiomyopathy Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submittercurationWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpAug 18, 2011- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern OntarioApr 22, 2016- -
Hypertrichotic osteochondrodysplasia Cantu type Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsJul 27, 2015This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.42
CADD
Benign
8.6
DANN
Benign
0.72

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs35404804; hg19: chr12-21995400; API