rs35404804

chr12-21842466-G-A

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points: 0P and 19B. BP4_Moderate BP6_Very_Strong BP7 BS1 BS2

The NM_020297.4(ABCC9):c.3321C>T(p.Ile1107=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00211 in 1,613,962 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 58 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

• Frequency:
  • Genomes: 𝑓 0.011 (29 hom., cov: 32)
  • Exomes 𝑓: 0.0012 (29 hom.)
• Consequence: ABCC9 NM_020297.4 synonymous
• Clinical Significance: Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:12
• Conservation: PhyloP100: 1.88

Genes affected

ABCC9 (HGNC:60): (ATP binding cassette subfamily C member 9) The protein encoded by this gene is a member of the superfamily of ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters. ABC proteins transport various molecules across extra- and intra-cellular membranes. ABC genes are divided into seven distinct subfamilies (ABC1, MDR/TAP, MRP, ALD, OABP, GCN20, White). This protein is a member of the MRP subfamily which is involved in multi-drug resistance. This protein is thought to form ATP-sensitive potassium channels in cardiac, skeletal, and vascular and non-vascular smooth muscle. Protein structure suggests a role as the drug-binding channel-modulating subunit of the extra-pancreatic ATP-sensitive potassium channels. Mutations in this gene are associated with cardiomyopathy dilated type 1O. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2011]

(HGNC:):

ACMG classification

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points.

• BP4: Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.42).
• BP6: Variant 12-21842466-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr12-21842466-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 35632.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr12-21842466-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr12-21842466-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
• BP7: Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=1.88 with no splicing effect.
• BS1: Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0112 (1699/152256) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.039 (1620/41536). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0374. There are 29 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 797 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. This position pass quality control queck.
• BS2: High Homozygotes in GnomAd at 29 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	UniProt
ABCC9	NM_020297.4	c.3321C>T	p.Ile1107=	synonymous_variant	29/40	ENST00000261200.9

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Appris	UniProt
ABCC9	ENST00000261200.9	c.3321C>T	p.Ile1107=	synonymous_variant	29/40	5	NM_020297.4	P4
	ENST00000539874.1	n.331+11272G>A		intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant		3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0111 AC: 1696 AN: 152140 Hom.: 29 Cov.: 32

Gnomad AFR AF: 0.0390

Gnomad AMI AF: 0.00

Gnomad AMR AF: 0.00353

Gnomad ASJ AF: 0.00

Gnomad EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad SAS AF: 0.000207

Gnomad FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad MID AF: 0.00

Gnomad NFE AF: 0.000118

Gnomad OTH AF: 0.00814

GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00304 AC: 763 AN: 251378 Hom.: 17 AF XY: 0.00210 AC XY: 285 AN XY: 135858

Gnomad AFR exome AF: 0.0418

Gnomad AMR exome AF: 0.00173

Gnomad ASJ exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad EAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad SAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad FIN exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad NFE exome AF: 0.000106

Gnomad OTH exome AF: 0.00196

GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00117 AC: 1704 AN: 1461706 Hom.: 29 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000981 AC XY: 713 AN XY: 727164

Gnomad4 AFR exome AF: 0.0410

Gnomad4 AMR exome AF: 0.00210

Gnomad4 ASJ exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome AF: 0.0000232

Gnomad4 FIN exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome AF: 0.0000729

Gnomad4 OTH exome AF: 0.00252

GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0112 AC: 1699 AN: 152256 Hom.: 29 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0107 AC XY: 797 AN XY: 74464

Gnomad4 AFR AF: 0.0390

Gnomad4 AMR AF: 0.00353

Gnomad4 ASJ AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 SAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 NFE AF: 0.000118

Gnomad4 OTH AF: 0.00806

Alfa AF: 0.00314 Hom.: 10

Bravo AF: 0.0131

Asia WGS AF: 0.000866 AC: 3 AN: 3478

EpiCase AF: 0.000273

EpiControl AF: 0.000415

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:12

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:4

Benign, no assertion criteria provided	clinical testing	Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center	-	- -
Benign, no assertion criteria provided	clinical testing	Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center	-	- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine	May 19, 2009	- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	GeneDx	Mar 05, 2014	This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Dilated cardiomyopathy 1O Benign:2

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Invitae	Jan 31, 2024	- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina	Jan 13, 2018	This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Cardiomyopathy Benign:2

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	curation	Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp	Aug 18, 2011	- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario	Apr 22, 2016	- -

not provided Benign:2

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories	Sep 20, 2023	- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided	clinical testing	Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen	-	- -

Hypertrichotic osteochondrodysplasia Cantu type Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 13, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Ambry Genetics

Jul 27, 2015

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
BayesDel_noAF	Benign	-0.42
Cadd	Benign	8.6
Dann	Benign	0.72

Splicing

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)		0.0		Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs35404804; hg19: chr12-21995400;