rs35843327

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_001079866.2(BCS1L):ā€‹c.1017T>Cā€‹(p.Pro339=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0601 in 1,614,096 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 8,930 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (ā˜…ā˜…).

Frequency

Genomes: š‘“ 0.15 ( 3979 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes š‘“: 0.050 ( 4951 hom. )

Consequence

BCS1L
NM_001079866.2 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:12

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.129
Variant links:
Genes affected
BCS1L (HGNC:1020): (BCS1 homolog, ubiquinol-cytochrome c reductase complex chaperone) This gene encodes a homolog of the S. cerevisiae bcs1 protein which is involved in the assembly of complex III of the mitochondrial respiratory chain. The encoded protein does not contain a mitochondrial targeting sequence but experimental studies confirm that it is imported into mitochondria. Mutations in this gene are associated with mitochondrial complex III deficiency and the GRACILE syndrome. Several alternatively spliced transcripts encoding two different isoforms have been described. [provided by RefSeq, Jan 2016]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.65).
BP6
Variant 2-218663143-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-218663143-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 136505.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.129 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.424 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
BCS1LNM_001079866.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.1017T>C p.Pro339= synonymous_variant 8/8 ENST00000359273.8 NP_001073335.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
BCS1LENST00000359273.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.1017T>C p.Pro339= synonymous_variant 8/81 NM_001079866.2 ENSP00000352219 P1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.152
AC:
23109
AN:
152092
Hom.:
3958
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.429
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.0230
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0740
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0493
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.119
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.0526
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0277
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.108
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0379
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.126
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0717
AC:
18033
AN:
251388
Hom.:
1820
AF XY:
0.0645
AC XY:
8769
AN XY:
135892
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.435
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0417
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0466
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.115
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0506
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0320
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0379
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0614
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0505
AC:
73763
AN:
1461886
Hom.:
4951
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.0495
AC XY:
36014
AN XY:
727248
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.453
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0451
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.0494
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.113
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0501
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0317
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0360
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0714
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.152
AC:
23191
AN:
152210
Hom.:
3979
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.148
AC XY:
11000
AN XY:
74430
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.430
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.0740
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.0493
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.120
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.0531
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.0277
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0379
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.125
Alfa
AF:
0.0848
Hom.:
866
Bravo
AF:
0.168
Asia WGS
AF:
0.0960
AC:
333
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.0401
EpiControl
AF:
0.0417

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:12
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

GRACILE syndrome Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabJun 10, 2021- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingNatera, Inc.Sep 16, 2020- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
not provided Benign:3
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingMayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo ClinicFeb 22, 2016- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpFeb 01, 2024- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitternot providedBreakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics-- -
not specified Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineMar 21, 2016p.Pro339Pro in exon 9 of BCS1L: This variant is not expected to have clinical si gnificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue, is not located withi n the splice consensus sequence, and has been identified in 50.45% (667/1322) of African chromosomes by the 1000 Genomes Project (Phase 3; dbSNP rs35843327). -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxOct 18, 2011This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Mitochondrial complex III deficiency nuclear type 1 Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabJun 10, 2021- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Pili torti-deafness syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabJun 10, 2021- -
Leigh syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.65
CADD
Benign
7.9
DANN
Benign
0.58
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.7

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs35843327; hg19: chr2-219527866; COSMIC: COSV55306933; COSMIC: COSV55306933; API