rs370873040

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -4 ACMG points: 0P and 4B. BP4_ModerateBP6BP7

The NM_001164507.2(NEB):c.23013C>T(p.Ser7671Ser) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000461 in 1,563,474 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00026 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00048 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

NEB
NM_001164507.2 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:3B:3

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.73

Publications

0 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

NEB (HGNC:7720): (nebulin) This gene encodes nebulin, a giant protein component of the cytoskeletal matrix that coexists with the thick and thin filaments within the sarcomeres of skeletal muscle. In most vertebrates, nebulin accounts for 3 to 4% of the total myofibrillar protein. The encoded protein contains approximately 30-amino acid long modules that can be classified into 7 types and other repeated modules. Protein isoform sizes vary from 600 to 800 kD due to alternative splicing that is tissue-, species-,and developmental stage-specific. Of the 183 exons in the nebulin gene, at least 43 are alternatively spliced, although exons 143 and 144 are not found in the same transcript. Of the several thousand transcript variants predicted for nebulin, the RefSeq Project has decided to create three representative RefSeq records. Mutations in this gene are associated with recessive nemaline myopathy. [provided by RefSeq, Sep 2009]

NEB links:

RIF1 (HGNC:23207): (replication timing regulatory factor 1) This gene encodes a protein that shares homology with the yeast teleomere binding protein, Rap1 interacting factor 1. This protein localizes to aberrant telomeres may be involved in DNA repair. Alternate splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2010]

RIF1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -4 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.3).

BP6

Variant 2-151514821-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-151514821-G-A is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 194295.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=1.73 with no splicing effect.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
NEB	NM_001164507.2 link	c.23013C>T	p.Ser7671Ser	synonymous_variant	Exon 158 of 182	ENST00000427231.7	NP_001157979.2
NEB	NM_001164508.2 link	c.23013C>T	p.Ser7671Ser	synonymous_variant	Exon 158 of 182	ENST00000397345.8	NP_001157980.2

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
NEB	ENST00000397345.8 link	c.23013C>T	p.Ser7671Ser	synonymous_variant	Exon 158 of 182	5	NM_001164508.2	ENSP00000380505.3		P20929-2
NEB	ENST00000427231.7 link	c.23013C>T	p.Ser7671Ser	synonymous_variant	Exon 158 of 182	5	NM_001164507.2	ENSP00000416578.2		P20929-3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000256

AC:

AN:

152074

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0000724

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.0000655

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000515

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.000302

AC:

AN:

181890

AF XY:

0.000363

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.0000554

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000700

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000483

AC:

682

AN:

1411400

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000453

AC XY:

316

AN XY:

697774

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

32418

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000133

AC:

AN:

37486

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

25240

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

37856

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.0000377

AC:

AN:

79542

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.0000394

AC:

AN:

50704

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5698

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.000602

AC:

652

AN:

1083934

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000342

AC:

AN:

58522

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.448

Heterozygous variant carriers

117

146

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

104

130

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000256

AC:

AN:

152074

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000215

AC XY:

AN XY:

74266

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0000724

AC:

AN:

41410

American (AMR)

AF:

0.0000655

AC:

AN:

15262

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3472

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5186

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4814

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10592

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

316

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.000515

AC:

AN:

68024

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

2086

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.485

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.000345

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000291

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:3Benign:3

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Nemaline myopathy 2

Uncertain:1Benign:2

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Jan 28, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Apr 30, 2020

Natera, Inc.

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided

Uncertain:2

Dec 23, 2014

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jun 01, 2016

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not specified

Benign:1

Dec 05, 2017

GeneDx

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.30

CADD

Benign

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.68

PhyloP100

1.7

Mutation Taster

=96/4

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.19

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over