rs3731748

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_001267550.2(TTN):​c.93243C>T​(p.Ala31081Ala) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.157 in 1,613,564 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 22,907 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.16 ( 2329 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.16 ( 20578 hom. )

Consequence

TTN
NM_001267550.2 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:21

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.178

Publications

20 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
TTN (HGNC:12403): (titin) This gene encodes a large abundant protein of striated muscle. The product of this gene is divided into two regions, a N-terminal I-band and a C-terminal A-band. The I-band, which is the elastic part of the molecule, contains two regions of tandem immunoglobulin domains on either side of a PEVK region that is rich in proline, glutamate, valine and lysine. The A-band, which is thought to act as a protein-ruler, contains a mixture of immunoglobulin and fibronectin repeats, and possesses kinase activity. An N-terminal Z-disc region and a C-terminal M-line region bind to the Z-line and M-line of the sarcomere, respectively, so that a single titin molecule spans half the length of a sarcomere. Titin also contains binding sites for muscle associated proteins so it serves as an adhesion template for the assembly of contractile machinery in muscle cells. It has also been identified as a structural protein for chromosomes. Alternative splicing of this gene results in multiple transcript variants. Considerable variability exists in the I-band, the M-line and the Z-disc regions of titin. Variability in the I-band region contributes to the differences in elasticity of different titin isoforms and, therefore, to the differences in elasticity of different muscle types. Mutations in this gene are associated with familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 9, and autoantibodies to titin are produced in patients with the autoimmune disease scleroderma. [provided by RefSeq, Feb 2012]
TTN-AS1 (HGNC:44124): (TTN antisense RNA 1) This gene encodes a non-coding RNA transcribed from the opposite strand to the titin gene. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2016]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.75).
BP6
Variant 2-178548383-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-178548383-G-A is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 47530.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.178 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.428 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
TTNNM_001267550.2 linkc.93243C>T p.Ala31081Ala synonymous_variant Exon 339 of 363 ENST00000589042.5 NP_001254479.2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
TTNENST00000589042.5 linkc.93243C>T p.Ala31081Ala synonymous_variant Exon 339 of 363 5 NM_001267550.2 ENSP00000467141.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.163
AC:
24696
AN:
151878
Hom.:
2323
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.145
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.472
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.135
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.185
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.443
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.271
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.163
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.120
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.146
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.149
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.183
AC:
45432
AN:
248198
AF XY:
0.186
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.143
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.149
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.188
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.430
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.152
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.144
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.163
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.157
AC:
229267
AN:
1461568
Hom.:
20578
Cov.:
35
AF XY:
0.160
AC XY:
116291
AN XY:
727068
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.143
AC:
4790
AN:
33474
American (AMR)
AF:
0.150
AC:
6694
AN:
44722
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.185
AC:
4824
AN:
26128
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.434
AC:
17216
AN:
39700
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.259
AC:
22323
AN:
86258
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.151
AC:
8076
AN:
53350
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.132
AC:
762
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.139
AC:
154368
AN:
1111798
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.169
AC:
10214
AN:
60370
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.482
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
13697
27394
41090
54787
68484
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
5814
11628
17442
23256
29070
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.163
AC:
24710
AN:
151996
Hom.:
2329
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.167
AC XY:
12380
AN XY:
74288
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.145
AC:
6003
AN:
41474
American (AMR)
AF:
0.135
AC:
2061
AN:
15260
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.185
AC:
643
AN:
3468
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.443
AC:
2276
AN:
5140
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.269
AC:
1294
AN:
4804
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.163
AC:
1722
AN:
10582
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.129
AC:
38
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.146
AC:
9911
AN:
67954
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.158
AC:
333
AN:
2112
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.503
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1032
2064
3095
4127
5159
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
284
568
852
1136
1420
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.152
Hom.:
4279
Bravo
AF:
0.161
Asia WGS
AF:
0.347
AC:
1208
AN:
3476
EpiCase
AF:
0.138
EpiControl
AF:
0.142

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:21
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:9
-
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Apr 09, 2025
Molecular Diagnostic Laboratory for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease, Montreal Heart Institute
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Apr 11, 2012
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Oct 31, 2012
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Oct 21, 2013
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Aug 19, 2019
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Aug 15, 2013
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2J Benign:2
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Sep 10, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Early-onset myopathy with fatal cardiomyopathy Benign:2
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Sep 10, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Myopathy, myofibrillar, 9, with early respiratory failure Benign:2
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Sep 10, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Tibial muscular dystrophy Benign:2
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Sep 10, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2J;C1858763:Dilated cardiomyopathy 1G Benign:1
Feb 04, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Dilated cardiomyopathy 1G Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

not provided Benign:1
-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Jan 16, 2013
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.75
CADD
Benign
0.20
DANN
Benign
0.85
PhyloP100
0.18
Mutation Taster
=99/1
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs3731748; hg19: chr2-179413110; COSMIC: COSV59894670; COSMIC: COSV59894670; API