rs373935449
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 2 ACMG points: 2P and 0B. PM2
The NM_016239.4(MYO15A):c.7068C>A(p.Asp2356Glu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000000685 in 1,459,728 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/26 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar. Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. D2356D) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_016239.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 3Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), PanelApp Australia
- nonsyndromic genetic hearing lossInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
- hearing loss, autosomal recessiveInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 2 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MYO15A | NM_016239.4 | c.7068C>A | p.Asp2356Glu | missense_variant | Exon 34 of 66 | ENST00000647165.2 | NP_057323.3 | |
| MYO15A | XM_017024715.3 | c.7071C>A | p.Asp2357Glu | missense_variant | Exon 32 of 64 | XP_016880204.1 | ||
| MYO15A | XM_017024714.3 | c.7008C>A | p.Asp2336Glu | missense_variant | Exon 31 of 63 | XP_016880203.1 |
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome AF: 6.85e-7 AC: 1AN: 1459728Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00000138 AC XY: 1AN XY: 726064 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at