rs3745503

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_001145809.2(MYH14):​c.2827-9A>C variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.122 in 1,539,722 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 13,451 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.15 ( 2021 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.12 ( 11430 hom. )

Consequence

MYH14
NM_001145809.2 intron

Scores

2
Splicing: ADA: 0.00003119
2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:10

Conservation

PhyloP100: -2.07

Publications

9 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
MYH14 (HGNC:23212): (myosin heavy chain 14) This gene encodes a member of the myosin superfamily. The protein represents a conventional non-muscle myosin; it should not be confused with the unconventional myosin-14 (MYO14). Myosins are actin-dependent motor proteins with diverse functions including regulation of cytokinesis, cell motility, and cell polarity. Mutations in this gene result in one form of autosomal dominant hearing impairment. Multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Dec 2011]
MYH14 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss 4A
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: PanelApp Australia, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics
  • peripheral neuropathy-myopathy-hoarseness-hearing loss syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, MODERATE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • nonsyndromic genetic hearing loss
    Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: ClinGen
  • autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.89).
BP6
Variant 19-50268152-A-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr19-50268152-A-C is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 44060.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (SAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.23 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
MYH14NM_001145809.2 linkc.2827-9A>C intron_variant Intron 23 of 42 ENST00000642316.2 NP_001139281.1 Q7Z406-2A1L2Z2B3KWH4
MYH14NM_001077186.2 linkc.2728-9A>C intron_variant Intron 22 of 41 NP_001070654.1 Q7Z406-6B3KWH4
MYH14NM_024729.4 linkc.2704-9A>C intron_variant Intron 21 of 40 NP_079005.3 Q7Z406-1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
MYH14ENST00000642316.2 linkc.2827-9A>C intron_variant Intron 23 of 42 NM_001145809.2 ENSP00000493594.1 Q7Z406-2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.148
AC:
22521
AN:
151930
Hom.:
2017
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.234
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.0592
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0794
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.218
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.233
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.240
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0794
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.162
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.107
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.136
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.140
AC:
20664
AN:
148054
AF XY:
0.146
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.243
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0566
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.214
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.227
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0858
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.107
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.123
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.119
AC:
164582
AN:
1387676
Hom.:
11430
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
0.122
AC XY:
83231
AN XY:
684026
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.240
AC:
7569
AN:
31494
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0609
AC:
2171
AN:
35660
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.213
AC:
5346
AN:
25138
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.260
AC:
9266
AN:
35644
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.229
AC:
18139
AN:
79090
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0851
AC:
3581
AN:
42060
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.152
AC:
663
AN:
4360
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.102
AC:
109978
AN:
1076576
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.136
AC:
7869
AN:
57654
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.488
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
7857
15715
23572
31430
39287
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
4262
8524
12786
17048
21310
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.148
AC:
22546
AN:
152046
Hom.:
2021
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.148
AC XY:
10968
AN XY:
74328
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.234
AC:
9701
AN:
41456
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0792
AC:
1210
AN:
15270
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.218
AC:
758
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.232
AC:
1197
AN:
5162
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.239
AC:
1149
AN:
4816
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0794
AC:
840
AN:
10584
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.161
AC:
47
AN:
292
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.107
AC:
7296
AN:
67974
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.139
AC:
294
AN:
2110
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.508
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
985
1971
2956
3942
4927
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
254
508
762
1016
1270
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.115
Hom.:
1413
Bravo
AF:
0.149
Asia WGS
AF:
0.241
AC:
836
AN:
3476

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:10
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:5
-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

May 09, 2017
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

May 07, 2012
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

2827-9A>C in Intron 23 of MYH14: This variant is not expected to have clinical s ignificance because it has been identified in 18.4% (607/3304) of African Americ an chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (ht tp://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs3745503). -

Autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss 4A Benign:2
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Sep 05, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:2
Feb 02, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Peripheral neuropathy-myopathy-hoarseness-hearing loss syndrome Benign:1
Sep 05, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.89
CADD
Benign
0.24
DANN
Benign
0.56
PhyloP100
-2.1
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
dbscSNV1_ADA
Benign
0.000031
dbscSNV1_RF
Benign
0.012
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs3745503; hg19: chr19-50771409; COSMIC: COSV51826530; COSMIC: COSV51826530; API