rs397516365
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -7 ACMG points: 0P and 7B. BP4_ModerateBP6BS2
The NM_001018005.2(TPM1):c.27G>A(p.Gln9Gln) variant causes a synonymous change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000601 in 1,613,276 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001018005.2 synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -7 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes   AF:  0.0000460  AC: 7AN: 152198Hom.:  0  Cov.: 33 show subpopulations 
GnomAD2 exomes  AF:  0.000112  AC: 28AN: 248982 AF XY:  0.0000889   show subpopulations 
GnomAD4 exome  AF:  0.0000616  AC: 90AN: 1461078Hom.:  0  Cov.: 31 AF XY:  0.0000564  AC XY: 41AN XY: 726912 show subpopulations 
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome   AF:  0.0000460  AC: 7AN: 152198Hom.:  0  Cov.: 33 AF XY:  0.0000672  AC XY: 5AN XY: 74354 show subpopulations 
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified    Benign:3 
Gln9Gln in exon 1 of TPM1: This variant is not expected to have clinical signifi cance because it does not alter an amino acid residue and is not located within the splice consensus sequence. Gln9Gln in exon 1 of TPM1 (allele frequency = n/ a) -
- -
- -
not provided    Benign:3 
- -
- -
TPM1: BP4, BP7 -
Cardiomyopathy    Benign:2 
- -
- -
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy    Benign:2 
- -
- -
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 3    Uncertain:1 
This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
Dilated cardiomyopathy 1Y    Uncertain:1 
This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
Cardiovascular phenotype    Benign:1 
This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Computational scores
Source: 
Splicing
 Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at