rs4145333

Variant names:

• chr2-178580041-C-G
• rs4145333
• NM_001267550.2:c.67246G>C

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

• chr2-178580041-C-G
• chr2-178580041-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_Strong BP6_Very_Strong BA1

The NM_001267550.2(TTN):​c.67246G>C​(p.Ala22416Pro) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.999 in 1,613,358 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 805,230 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/18 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

• Frequency:
  • Genomes: 𝑓 1.0 (75484 hom., cov: 32)
  • Exomes 𝑓: 1.0 (729746 hom.)
• Consequence: TTN NM_001267550.2 missense
• Clinical Significance: Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:26
• Conservation: PhyloP100: 0.887

Genes affected

TTN (HGNC:12403): (titin) This gene encodes a large abundant protein of striated muscle. The product of this gene is divided into two regions, a N-terminal I-band and a C-terminal A-band. The I-band, which is the elastic part of the molecule, contains two regions of tandem immunoglobulin domains on either side of a PEVK region that is rich in proline, glutamate, valine and lysine. The A-band, which is thought to act as a protein-ruler, contains a mixture of immunoglobulin and fibronectin repeats, and possesses kinase activity. An N-terminal Z-disc region and a C-terminal M-line region bind to the Z-line and M-line of the sarcomere, respectively, so that a single titin molecule spans half the length of a sarcomere. Titin also contains binding sites for muscle associated proteins so it serves as an adhesion template for the assembly of contractile machinery in muscle cells. It has also been identified as a structural protein for chromosomes. Alternative splicing of this gene results in multiple transcript variants. Considerable variability exists in the I-band, the M-line and the Z-disc regions of titin. Variability in the I-band region contributes to the differences in elasticity of different titin isoforms and, therefore, to the differences in elasticity of different muscle types. Mutations in this gene are associated with familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 9, and autoantibodies to titin are produced in patients with the autoimmune disease scleroderma. [provided by RefSeq, Feb 2012]

TTN-AS1 (HGNC:44124): (TTN antisense RNA 1) This gene encodes a non-coding RNA transcribed from the opposite strand to the titin gene. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2016]

ENSG00000270574 (HGNC:):

ACMG classification

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

• BP4: Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=5.901181E-7).
• BP6: Variant 2-178580041-C-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-178580041-C-G is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 47250.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr2-178580041-C-G is described in Lovd as [Benign].
• BA1: GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (SAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.993 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
TTN	NM_001267550.2	c.67246G>C	p.Ala22416Pro	missense_variant	Exon 318 of 363	ENST00000589042.5	NP_001254479.2

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
TTN	ENST00000589042.5	c.67246G>C	p.Ala22416Pro	missense_variant	Exon 318 of 363	5	NM_001267550.2	ENSP00000467141.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.996 AC: 151443 AN: 152048 Hom.: 75426 Cov.: 32

Gnomad AFR AF: 0.986

Gnomad AMI AF: 1.00

Gnomad AMR AF: 0.999

Gnomad ASJ AF: 1.00

Gnomad EAS AF: 1.00

Gnomad SAS AF: 1.00

Gnomad FIN AF: 1.00

Gnomad MID AF: 0.991

Gnomad NFE AF: 1.00

Gnomad OTH AF: 0.998

GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.999 AC: 248241 AN: 248558 Hom.: 123962 AF XY: 0.999 AC XY: 134698 AN XY: 134844

Gnomad AFR exome AF: 0.985

Gnomad AMR exome AF: 0.999

Gnomad ASJ exome AF: 1.00

Gnomad EAS exome AF: 1.00

Gnomad SAS exome AF: 1.00

Gnomad FIN exome AF: 1.00

Gnomad NFE exome AF: 1.00

Gnomad OTH exome AF: 0.999

GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.999 AC: 1460338 AN: 1461192 Hom.: 729746 Cov.: 65 AF XY: 0.999 AC XY: 726519 AN XY: 726890

Gnomad4 AFR exome AF: 0.985

Gnomad4 AMR exome AF: 0.999

Gnomad4 ASJ exome AF: 1.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome AF: 1.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome AF: 1.00

Gnomad4 FIN exome AF: 1.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome AF: 1.00

Gnomad4 OTH exome AF: 0.999

GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.996 AC: 151560 AN: 152166 Hom.: 75484 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.996 AC XY: 74091 AN XY: 74372

Gnomad4 AFR AF: 0.987

Gnomad4 AMR AF: 0.999

Gnomad4 ASJ AF: 1.00

Gnomad4 EAS AF: 1.00

Gnomad4 SAS AF: 1.00

Gnomad4 FIN AF: 1.00

Gnomad4 NFE AF: 1.00

Gnomad4 OTH AF: 0.998

Alfa AF: 0.963 Hom.: 53521

Bravo AF: 0.995

TwinsUK AF: 1.00 AC: 3708

ALSPAC AF: 1.00 AC: 3854

ESP6500AA AF: 0.986 AC: 3778

ESP6500EA AF: 1.00 AC: 8261

ExAC AF: 0.999 AC: 120644

Asia WGS AF: 1.00 AC: 3477 AN: 3478

EpiCase AF: 1.00

EpiControl AF: 1.00

ClinVar

Significance: Benign

Submissions summary: Benign:26

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:12

Sep 16, 2011

Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Ala19848Pro in Exon 267 of TTN: This variant is not expected to have clinical si gnificance because it has been reported in dbSNP with a MAF >3% (rs4145333). -

-

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 31, 2013

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

-

Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Aug 15, 2013

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-

Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-

Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jun 24, 2013

Biesecker Lab/Clinical Genomics Section, National Institutes of Health

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: research

- -

Dec 05, 2014

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Aug 09, 2019

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2J Benign:2

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Sep 10, 2021

Genome-Nilou Lab

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Early-onset myopathy with fatal cardiomyopathy Benign:2

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Sep 10, 2021

Genome-Nilou Lab

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:2

Jan 28, 2019

Athena Diagnostics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: not provided

- -

Tibial muscular dystrophy Benign:2

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Sep 10, 2021

Genome-Nilou Lab

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Myopathy, myofibrillar, 9, with early respiratory failure Benign:2

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Sep 10, 2021

Genome-Nilou Lab

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2J;C1858763:Dilated cardiomyopathy 1G Benign:1

Feb 04, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Dilated cardiomyopathy 1G Benign:1

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Cardiomyopathy Benign:1

Sep 28, 2015

CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1

Aug 09, 2012

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
AlphaMissense	Benign	0.080
BayesDel_addAF	Benign	-0.61	T
BayesDel_noAF	Benign	-0.63
CADD	Benign	13
DANN	Benign	0.80
Eigen	Benign	-1.3
Eigen_PC	Benign	-1.2
FATHMM_MKL	Benign	0.11	N
LIST_S2	Benign	0.11	T;T;T;.;T;T;T
MetaRNN	Benign	5.9e-7	T;T;T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM	Benign	-1.0	T
MutationAssessor	Benign	-0.14	.;.;.;N;.;.;N
PrimateAI	Benign	0.47	T
PROVEAN	Benign	-0.070	N;N;.;.;N;N;.
REVEL	Benign	0.10
Sift	Benign	0.37	T;T;.;.;T;T;.
Polyphen		0.0	.;.;.;B;.;.;B
Vest4		0.033
MPC		0.11
ClinPred		0.00030	T
GERP RS		1.8

Splicing

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)		0.0		Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs4145333; hg19: chr2-179444768;