rs4525

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_000130.5(F5):​c.2594A>G​(p.His865Arg) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.269 in 1,613,802 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 60,144 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.25 ( 4755 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.27 ( 55389 hom. )

Consequence

F5
NM_000130.5 missense

Scores

2
16

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:11

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.391

Publications

60 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
F5 (HGNC:3542): (coagulation factor V) This gene encodes an essential cofactor of the blood coagulation cascade. This factor circulates in plasma, and is converted to the active form by the release of the activation peptide by thrombin during coagulation. This generates a heavy chain and a light chain which are held together by calcium ions. The activated protein is a cofactor that participates with activated coagulation factor X to activate prothrombin to thrombin. Defects in this gene result in either an autosomal recessive hemorrhagic diathesis or an autosomal dominant form of thrombophilia, which is known as activated protein C resistance. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2008]
F5 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • thrombophilia due to activated protein C resistance
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: ClinGen, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Genomics England PanelApp
  • congenital factor V deficiency
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • East Texas bleeding disorder
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=8.5651875E-4).
BP6
Variant 1-169542496-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-169542496-T-C is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 255201.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AMR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.334 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
F5NM_000130.5 linkc.2594A>G p.His865Arg missense_variant Exon 13 of 25 ENST00000367797.9 NP_000121.2 P12259

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
F5ENST00000367797.9 linkc.2594A>G p.His865Arg missense_variant Exon 13 of 25 1 NM_000130.5 ENSP00000356771.3 P12259
F5ENST00000367796.3 linkc.2609A>G p.His870Arg missense_variant Exon 13 of 25 5 ENSP00000356770.3 A0A0A0MRJ7

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.245
AC:
37279
AN:
152026
Hom.:
4745
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.183
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.191
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.341
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.168
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.234
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.323
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.211
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.244
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.267
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.261
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.278
AC:
69851
AN:
250816
AF XY:
0.278
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.179
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.415
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.177
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.222
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.213
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.268
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.286
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.272
AC:
397345
AN:
1461662
Hom.:
55389
Cov.:
57
AF XY:
0.273
AC XY:
198318
AN XY:
727126
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.180
AC:
6036
AN:
33472
American (AMR)
AF:
0.409
AC:
18277
AN:
44716
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.176
AC:
4597
AN:
26124
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.226
AC:
8988
AN:
39696
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.325
AC:
28072
AN:
86246
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.217
AC:
11593
AN:
53412
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.276
AC:
1592
AN:
5766
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.272
AC:
302232
AN:
1111836
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.264
AC:
15958
AN:
60394
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.464
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
17995
35990
53985
71980
89975
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
10182
20364
30546
40728
50910
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.245
AC:
37316
AN:
152140
Hom.:
4755
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.247
AC XY:
18362
AN XY:
74396
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.183
AC:
7594
AN:
41520
American (AMR)
AF:
0.341
AC:
5213
AN:
15266
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.168
AC:
583
AN:
3466
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.234
AC:
1211
AN:
5170
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.324
AC:
1562
AN:
4824
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.211
AC:
2231
AN:
10588
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.235
AC:
69
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.267
AC:
18131
AN:
67990
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.260
AC:
548
AN:
2110
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.506
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1468
2936
4405
5873
7341
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
394
788
1182
1576
1970
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.263
Hom.:
14892
Bravo
AF:
0.254
TwinsUK
AF:
0.270
AC:
1002
ALSPAC
AF:
0.281
AC:
1082
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.185
AC:
814
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.274
AC:
2356
ExAC
AF:
0.274
AC:
33228
Asia WGS
AF:
0.283
AC:
983
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.269
EpiControl
AF:
0.270

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:11
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:3
-
Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:2
Nov 11, 2018
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Thrombophilia due to activated protein C resistance Benign:2
Jun 14, 2016
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jun 14, 2016
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Congenital factor V deficiency Benign:1
Feb 04, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Budd-Chiari syndrome Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Factor V deficiency Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Thrombophilia due to thrombin defect Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.10
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.84
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.83
CADD
Benign
0.020
DANN
Benign
0.34
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.084
T;T
Eigen
Benign
-1.2
Eigen_PC
Benign
-1.2
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.062
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.39
T;T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.00086
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.97
T
MutationAssessor
Uncertain
2.2
M;.
PhyloP100
-0.39
PrimateAI
Benign
0.24
T
PROVEAN
Uncertain
-2.5
N;N
REVEL
Benign
0.017
Sift
Benign
0.45
T;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.14
T;T
Polyphen
0.0
B;.
Vest4
0.032
MPC
0.11
ClinPred
0.0047
T
GERP RS
-1.1
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.7
Varity_R
0.021
gMVP
0.19
Mutation Taster
=87/13
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs4525; hg19: chr1-169511734; COSMIC: COSV63120688; API