rs4647130

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_000082.4(ERCC8):c.1080T>C(p.Ala360Ala) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00203 in 1,614,052 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 114 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0020 ( 11 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0020 ( 103 hom. )

Consequence

ERCC8
NM_000082.4 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:5

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.11

Publications

10 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

ERCC8 (HGNC:3439): (ERCC excision repair 8, CSA ubiquitin ligase complex subunit) This gene encodes a WD repeat protein, which interacts with Cockayne syndrome type B (CSB) protein and with p44 protein, a subunit of the RNA polymerase II transcription factor IIH. Mutations in this gene have been identified in patients with hereditary disease Cockayne syndrome (CS). CS cells are abnormally sensitive to ultraviolet radiation and are defective in the repair of transcriptionally active genes. Several transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Mar 2014]

ERCC8 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

Cockayne syndrome type 1
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Genomics England PanelApp, PanelApp Australia, ClinGen, Myriad Women’s Health, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
UV-sensitive syndrome 2
Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
Cockayne syndrome type 2
Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
UV-sensitive syndrome
Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

ERCC8 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.53).

BP6

Variant 5-60887482-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr5-60887482-A-G is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 193795.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-1.11 with no splicing effect.

BA1

GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.0508 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
ERCC8	NM_000082.4 link	c.1080T>C	p.Ala360Ala	synonymous_variant	Exon 11 of 12	ENST00000676185.1	NP_000073.1	Q13216-1
ERCC8	NM_001007233.3 link	c.906T>C	p.Ala302Ala	synonymous_variant	Exon 12 of 13		NP_001007234.1	B3KPW7
ERCC8	NM_001290285.2 link	c.621T>C	p.Ala207Ala	synonymous_variant	Exon 10 of 11		NP_001277214.1	B3KPW7B4DGZ9

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
ERCC8	ENST00000676185.1 link	c.1080T>C	p.Ala360Ala	synonymous_variant	Exon 11 of 12		NM_000082.4	ENSP00000501614.1		Q13216-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00207

AC:

315

AN:

152234

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0000241

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000196

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.0563

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00228

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000588

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00144

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.00426

AC:

1070

AN:

251446

AF XY:

0.00394

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.0000578

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.000198

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.0562

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000791

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00147

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00203

AC:

2972

AN:

1461700

Hom.:

103

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00198

AC XY:

1443

AN XY:

727172

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

33474

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000112

AC:

AN:

44724

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.000153

AC:

AN:

26126

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.0701

AC:

2780

AN:

39658

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.000475

AC:

AN:

86254

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53416

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.000347

AC:

AN:

5768

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000324

AC:

AN:

1111886

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00172

AC:

104

AN:

60394

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.469

Heterozygous variant carriers

144

288

432

576

720

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

132

176

220

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00205

AC:

312

AN:

152352

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00250

AC XY:

186

AN XY:

74512

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0000240

AC:

AN:

41592

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000196

AC:

AN:

15306

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3466

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.0561

AC:

291

AN:

5188

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00228

AC:

AN:

4826

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10622

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000588

AC:

AN:

68034

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000947

AC:

AN:

2112

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.491

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Genome Hom

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.000215

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00245

Asia WGS

AF:

0.0200

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.000109

EpiControl

AF:

0.000119

ClinVar

Significance: Benign

Submissions summary: Benign:5

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:2

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 31, 2015

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided

Benign:2

May 18, 2020

GeneDx

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 20, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Cockayne syndrome type 1

Benign:1

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.53

CADD

Benign

4.7

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.70

PhyloP100

-1.1

Mutation Taster

=99/1

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.010

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over