rs540984275

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_001035.3(RYR2):c.14844T>C(p.Cys4948Cys) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000205 in 1,612,850 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000072 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000015 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

RYR2
NM_001035.3 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:3

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.0940

Publications

1 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

RYR2 (HGNC:10484): (ryanodine receptor 2) This gene encodes a ryanodine receptor found in cardiac muscle sarcoplasmic reticulum. The encoded protein is one of the components of a calcium channel, composed of a tetramer of the ryanodine receptor proteins and a tetramer of FK506 binding protein 1B proteins, that supplies calcium to cardiac muscle. Mutations in this gene are associated with stress-induced polymorphic ventricular tachycardia and arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

RYR2 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia 2
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, NO_KNOWN Submitted by: Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Ambry Genetics
catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, ClinGen, G2P
catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia 1
Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: ClinGen
arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy
Inheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen

RYR2 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.59).

BP6

Variant 1-237832587-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-237832587-T-C is described in ClinVar as Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 238224.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.094 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.0000722 (11/152328) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.000265 (11/41576). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000148. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 4 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 11 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
RYR2	NM_001035.3 link	c.14844T>C	p.Cys4948Cys	synonymous_variant	Exon 105 of 105	ENST00000366574.7	NP_001026.2	Q92736-1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	UniProt
RYR2	ENST00000366574.7 link	c.14844T>C	p.Cys4948Cys	synonymous_variant	Exon 105 of 105	1	NM_001035.3	ENSP00000355533.2	Q92736-1
RYR2	ENST00000661330.2 link	c.14862T>C	p.Cys4954Cys	synonymous_variant	Exon 106 of 106			ENSP00000499393.2	A0A590UJF6
RYR2	ENST00000609119.2 link	n.*5936T>C		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	Exon 104 of 104	5		ENSP00000499659.2	A0A590UK06
RYR2	ENST00000609119.2 link	n.*5936T>C		3_prime_UTR_variant	Exon 104 of 104	5		ENSP00000499659.2	A0A590UK06

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0000591

AC:

AN:

152210

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000217

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.0000120

AC:

AN:

249006

AF XY:

0.00000740

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000129

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.0000291

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000151

AC:

AN:

1460522

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000110

AC XY:

AN XY:

726674

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.000478

AC:

AN:

33450

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

44656

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26100

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39686

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

86186

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53394

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.000173

AC:

AN:

5764

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00000180

AC:

AN:

1110948

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.0000497

AC:

AN:

60338

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.455

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0000722

AC:

AN:

152328

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000537

AC XY:

AN XY:

74488

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.000265

AC:

AN:

41576

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

15290

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3472

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5184

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4830

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10620

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

68038

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

2112

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.453

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.0000712

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0000567

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000289

AC:

AN:

3478

ClinVar

Significance: Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:3

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia

Benign:1

May 16, 2023

All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia 1

Benign:1

Oct 28, 2024

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Cardiovascular phenotype

Benign:1

Nov 05, 2020

Ambry Genetics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.59

CADD

Benign

5.5

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.60

PhyloP100

0.094

Mutation Taster

=83/17

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over