rs544234928

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBP6BS2

The NM_001277115.2(DNAH11):c.6383G>A(p.Arg2128Gln) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000793 in 1,613,822 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R2128G) has been classified as Benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000053 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000082 ( 2 hom. )

Consequence

DNAH11
NM_001277115.2 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:2B:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 10.0

Publications

1 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

DNAH11 (HGNC:2942): (dynein axonemal heavy chain 11) This gene encodes a ciliary outer dynein arm protein and is a member of the dynein heavy chain family. It is a microtubule-dependent motor ATPase and has been reported to be involved in the movement of respiratory cilia. Mutations in this gene have been implicated in causing Kartagener Syndrome (a combination of situs inversus totalis and Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia (PCD), also called Immotile Cilia Syndrome 1 (ICS1)) and male sterility. [provided by RefSeq, Mar 2013]

DNAH11 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

primary ciliary dyskinesia 7
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: PanelApp Australia, Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen
primary ciliary dyskinesia
Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

DNAH11 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -9 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.06349814).

BP6

Variant 7-21704543-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr7-21704543-G-A is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 579116.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 2 AR,AD gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
DNAH11	NM_001277115.2 link	c.6383G>A	p.Arg2128Gln	missense_variant	Exon 38 of 82	ENST00000409508.8	NP_001264044.1	Q96DT5Q96NT7H9NAJ8H9NAJ7

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
DNAH11	ENST00000409508.8 link	c.6383G>A	p.Arg2128Gln	missense_variant	Exon 38 of 82	5	NM_001277115.2	ENSP00000475939.1		Q96DT5

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0000526

AC:

AN:

152166

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0000241

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00145

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.000133

AC:

AN:

248784

AF XY:

0.000156

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.0000557

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000177

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000821

AC:

120

AN:

1461540

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000977

AC XY:

AN XY:

727042

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0000597

AC:

AN:

33474

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

44686

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26134

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.0000252

AC:

AN:

39692

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00117

AC:

101

AN:

86232

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53392

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.000347

AC:

AN:

5764

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00000899

AC:

AN:

1111796

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.0000663

AC:

AN:

60370

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.455

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0000525

AC:

AN:

152282

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000940

AC XY:

AN XY:

74458

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0000241

AC:

AN:

41556

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

15296

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3472

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5182

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00145

AC:

AN:

4828

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10610

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

68020

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

2112

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.450

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.00

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00000756

ExAC

AF:

0.000124

AC:

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000866

AC:

AN:

3478

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:1

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Primary ciliary dyskinesia 7

Uncertain:1

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

not provided

Uncertain:1

Apr 26, 2022

GeneDx

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge -

Primary ciliary dyskinesia

Benign:1

Nov 27, 2024

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.16

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.33

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.30

CADD

Uncertain

(source)

DANN

Pathogenic

1.0

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.32

.;.;T

Eigen

Pathogenic

0.83

Eigen_PC

Pathogenic

0.84

FATHMM_MKL

Pathogenic

1.0

LIST_S2

Pathogenic

0.98

D;D;D

M_CAP

Benign

0.027

MetaRNN

Benign

0.063

T;T;T

MetaSVM

Benign

-0.53

PhyloP100

PrimateAI

Benign

0.43

PROVEAN

Uncertain

-3.6

.;D;.

REVEL

Uncertain

0.35

Sift

Pathogenic

0.0

.;D;.

Vest4

0.53

MutPred

0.38

Gain of relative solvent accessibility (P = 0.0275);Gain of relative solvent accessibility (P = 0.0275);.;

MVP

0.44

ClinPred

0.65

GERP RS

5.4

Varity_R

0.22

gMVP

0.39

Mutation Taster

=59/41

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over