rs55757622

Variant names:

• chr2-178779089-G-A
• rs55757622
• NM_001267550.2:c.3993C>T

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

• chr2-178779089-G-A
• chr2-178779089-G-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points: 0P and 19B. BP4_Moderate BP6_Very_Strong BP7 BS1 BS2

The NM_001267550.2(TTN):​c.3993C>T​(p.Ile1331Ile) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00239 in 1,613,872 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 90 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

• Frequency:
  • Genomes: 𝑓 0.013 (50 hom., cov: 33)
  • Exomes 𝑓: 0.0013 (40 hom.)
• Consequence: TTN NM_001267550.2 synonymous
• Clinical Significance: Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:21
• Conservation: PhyloP100: 0.378

Genes affected

TTN (HGNC:12403): (titin) This gene encodes a large abundant protein of striated muscle. The product of this gene is divided into two regions, a N-terminal I-band and a C-terminal A-band. The I-band, which is the elastic part of the molecule, contains two regions of tandem immunoglobulin domains on either side of a PEVK region that is rich in proline, glutamate, valine and lysine. The A-band, which is thought to act as a protein-ruler, contains a mixture of immunoglobulin and fibronectin repeats, and possesses kinase activity. An N-terminal Z-disc region and a C-terminal M-line region bind to the Z-line and M-line of the sarcomere, respectively, so that a single titin molecule spans half the length of a sarcomere. Titin also contains binding sites for muscle associated proteins so it serves as an adhesion template for the assembly of contractile machinery in muscle cells. It has also been identified as a structural protein for chromosomes. Alternative splicing of this gene results in multiple transcript variants. Considerable variability exists in the I-band, the M-line and the Z-disc regions of titin. Variability in the I-band region contributes to the differences in elasticity of different titin isoforms and, therefore, to the differences in elasticity of different muscle types. Mutations in this gene are associated with familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 9, and autoantibodies to titin are produced in patients with the autoimmune disease scleroderma. [provided by RefSeq, Feb 2012]

TTN-AS1 (HGNC:44124): (TTN antisense RNA 1) This gene encodes a non-coding RNA transcribed from the opposite strand to the titin gene. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2016]

LOC101927055 (HGNC:):

ACMG classification

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points.

• BP4: Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.42).
• BP6: Variant 2-178779089-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-178779089-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 47014.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr2-178779089-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr2-178779089-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
• BP7: Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.378 with no splicing effect.
• BS1: Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0133 (2019/152306) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0455 (1890/41554). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0438. There are 50 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 942 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.
• BS2: High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 50 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
TTN	NM_001267550.2	c.3993C>T	p.Ile1331Ile	synonymous_variant	Exon 24 of 363	ENST00000589042.5	NP_001254479.2
TTN	NM_133379.5	c.3993C>T	p.Ile1331Ile	synonymous_variant	Exon 24 of 46	ENST00000360870.10	NP_596870.2

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
TTN	ENST00000589042.5	c.3993C>T	p.Ile1331Ile	synonymous_variant	Exon 24 of 363	5	NM_001267550.2	ENSP00000467141.1
TTN	ENST00000360870.10	c.3993C>T	p.Ile1331Ile	synonymous_variant	Exon 24 of 46	5	NM_133379.5	ENSP00000354117.4

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0132 AC: 2016 AN: 152188 Hom.: 51 Cov.: 33

Gnomad AFR AF: 0.0455

Gnomad AMI AF: 0.00

Gnomad AMR AF: 0.00563

Gnomad ASJ AF: 0.00

Gnomad EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad SAS AF: 0.000414

Gnomad FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad MID AF: 0.00633

Gnomad NFE AF: 0.000147

Gnomad OTH AF: 0.0139

GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00343 AC: 857 AN: 250004 Hom.: 25 AF XY: 0.00244 AC XY: 330 AN XY: 135092

Gnomad AFR exome AF: 0.0469

Gnomad AMR exome AF: 0.00197

Gnomad ASJ exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad EAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad SAS exome AF: 0.0000654

Gnomad FIN exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad NFE exome AF: 0.000115

Gnomad OTH exome AF: 0.00214

GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00126 AC: 1845 AN: 1461566 Hom.: 40 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.00105 AC XY: 761 AN XY: 727086

Gnomad4 AFR exome AF: 0.0438

Gnomad4 AMR exome AF: 0.00226

Gnomad4 ASJ exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome AF: 0.0000696

Gnomad4 FIN exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome AF: 0.0000567

Gnomad4 OTH exome AF: 0.00335

GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0133 AC: 2019 AN: 152306 Hom.: 50 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0126 AC XY: 942 AN XY: 74472

Gnomad4 AFR AF: 0.0455

Gnomad4 AMR AF: 0.00562

Gnomad4 ASJ AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 SAS AF: 0.000414

Gnomad4 FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 NFE AF: 0.000147

Gnomad4 OTH AF: 0.0137

Alfa AF: 0.00523 Hom.: 8

Bravo AF: 0.0149

Asia WGS AF: 0.00289 AC: 10 AN: 3478

EpiCase AF: 0.0000545

EpiControl AF: 0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:21

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:6

Feb 07, 2012

Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Apr 07, 2014

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

-

Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Nov 06, 2019

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Variant summary: TTN c.3993C>T alters a non-conserved nucleotide resulting in a synonymous change. 5/5 computational tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0034 in 250004 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.047 within the African or African-American subpopulation in the gnomAD database, including 24 homozygotes. The observed variant frequency within African or African-American control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 75-folds over the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in TTN causing Cardiomyopathy phenotype (0.00063), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of African or African-American origin. To our knowledge, no occurrence of c.3993C>T in individuals affected with Cardiomyopathy and no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function have been reported. A co-occurrence with another pathogenic variant has been reported (TTR c.424G>A, p.Val142Ile; internal sample). Four ClinVar submissions (evaluation after 2014) cite the variant three times a benign and once as likely benign. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. -

-

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Aug 15, 2013

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:3

-

Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Dec 21, 2022

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: not provided

- -

Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2J Benign:2

Sep 10, 2021

Genome-Nilou Lab

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Early-onset myopathy with fatal cardiomyopathy Benign:2

Sep 10, 2021

Genome-Nilou Lab

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Myopathy, myofibrillar, 9, with early respiratory failure Benign:2

Sep 10, 2021

Genome-Nilou Lab

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Tibial muscular dystrophy Benign:2

Sep 10, 2021

Genome-Nilou Lab

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2J;C1858763:Dilated cardiomyopathy 1G Benign:1

Feb 03, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Cardiomyopathy Benign:1

Mar 03, 2016

CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Dilated cardiomyopathy 1G Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1

May 27, 2015

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
BayesDel_noAF	Benign	-0.42
CADD	Benign	8.1
DANN	Benign	0.82

Splicing

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)		0.0		Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs55757622; hg19: chr2-179643816;