rs563089155
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points: 0P and 8B. BP4_ModerateBP6BP7BS1
The NM_001330078.2(NRXN1):c.3219C>T(p.Asn1073=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000764 in 1,609,904 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.000059 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000078 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
NRXN1
NM_001330078.2 synonymous
NM_001330078.2 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -0.0100
Genes affected
NRXN1 (HGNC:8008): (neurexin 1) This gene encodes a single-pass type I membrane protein that belongs to the neurexin family. Neurexins are cell-surface receptors that bind neuroligins to form Ca(2+)-dependent neurexin/neuroligin complexes at synapses in the central nervous system. This complex is required for efficient neurotransmission and is involved in the formation of synaptic contacts. Three members of this gene family have been studied in detail and are estimated to generate over 3,000 variants through the use of two alternative promoters (alpha and beta) and extensive alternative splicing in each family member. Recently, a third promoter (gamma) was identified for this gene in the 3' region. Mutations in this gene are associated with Pitt-Hopkins-like syndrome-2 and may contribute to susceptibility to schizophrenia. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2016]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.41).
BP6
Variant 2-50472323-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-50472323-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 129819.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=2, Benign=1, Uncertain_significance=2}.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.01 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0000592 (9/151994) while in subpopulation EAS AF= 0.00117 (6/5146). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000507. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 4 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NRXN1 | NM_001330078.2 | c.3219C>T | p.Asn1073= | synonymous_variant | 16/23 | ENST00000401669.7 | NP_001317007.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NRXN1 | ENST00000401669.7 | c.3219C>T | p.Asn1073= | synonymous_variant | 16/23 | 5 | NM_001330078.2 | ENSP00000385017 | A1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000593 AC: 9AN: 151876Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
9
AN:
151876
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000195 AC: 48AN: 246452Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000194 AC XY: 26AN XY: 133760
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
48
AN:
246452
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
26
AN XY:
133760
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000782 AC: 114AN: 1457910Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000717 AC XY: 52AN XY: 725166
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
114
AN:
1457910
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
52
AN XY:
725166
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000592 AC: 9AN: 151994Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000538 AC XY: 4AN XY: 74308
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
9
AN:
151994
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
4
AN XY:
74308
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
3
AN:
3478
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:3
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Pitt-Hopkins-like syndrome 2 Uncertain:1Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 14, 2024 | - - |
not provided Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Aug 27, 2013 | - - |
not specified Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jan 13, 2017 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | May 31, 2016 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at