rs6031592

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -19 ACMG points: 0P and 19B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_175914.5(HNF4A):c.744C>T(p.Asp248Asp) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000533 in 1,613,950 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 4 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0024 ( 2 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00034 ( 2 hom. )

Consequence

HNF4A
NM_175914.5 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:11

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.776

Publications

9 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

HNF4A (HGNC:5024): (hepatocyte nuclear factor 4 alpha) The protein encoded by this gene is a nuclear transcription factor which binds DNA as a homodimer. The encoded protein controls the expression of several genes, including hepatocyte nuclear factor 1 alpha, a transcription factor which regulates the expression of several hepatic genes. This gene may play a role in development of the liver, kidney, and intestines. Mutations in this gene have been associated with monogenic autosomal dominant non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus type I. Alternative splicing of this gene results in multiple transcript variants encoding several different isoforms. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2012]

HNF4A Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

maturity-onset diabetes of the young type 1
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics
monogenic diabetes
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
diabetes mellitus, noninsulin-dependent
Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
Fanconi renotubular syndrome 4 with maturity-onset diabetes of the young
Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, G2P
hyperinsulinism due to HNF4A deficiency
Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
maturity-onset diabetes of the young
Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

HNF4A links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -19 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.35).

BP6

Variant 20-44419794-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr20-44419794-C-T is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 36359.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.776 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00242 (368/152240) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.00753 (313/41562). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00684. There are 2 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 177 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 368 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
HNF4A	NM_175914.5 link	c.744C>T	p.Asp248Asp	synonymous_variant	Exon 7 of 10	ENST00000316673.9	NP_787110.2	P41235-5F1D8T0

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
HNF4A	ENST00000316673.9 link	c.744C>T	p.Asp248Asp	synonymous_variant	Exon 7 of 10	1	NM_175914.5	ENSP00000315180.4		P41235-5

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00240

AC:

365

AN:

152122

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00748

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00275

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00316

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000882

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00287

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.000589

AC:

148

AN:

251474

AF XY:

0.000478

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00701

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000491

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000123

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000489

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000337

AC:

492

AN:

1461710

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000320

AC XY:

233

AN XY:

727162

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00726

AC:

243

AN:

33478

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000648

AC:

AN:

44720

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26136

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39692

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.0000348

AC:

AN:

86258

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53394

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00538

AC:

AN:

5766

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000854

AC:

AN:

1111882

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00151

AC:

AN:

60384

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.487

Heterozygous variant carriers

117

146

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

100

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00242

AC:

368

AN:

152240

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00238

AC XY:

177

AN XY:

74456

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00753

AC:

313

AN:

41562

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00275

AC:

AN:

15292

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3466

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5172

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4822

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10586

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00340

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000882

AC:

AN:

68020

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00284

AC:

AN:

2114

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.498

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Genome Hom

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.00206

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00301

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00289

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.000109

EpiControl

AF:

0.000178

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:11

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Benign:4

Apr 01, 2022

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

HNF4A: BS1, BS2 -

Jan 24, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Nov 21, 2018

Athena Diagnostics

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 28, 2021

GeneDx

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not specified

Benign:2

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Mar 17, 2016

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Maturity-onset diabetes of the young type 1

Benign:2

Aug 18, 2011

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing;curation

- -

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Familial hyperinsulinism

Benign:1

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Type 2 diabetes mellitus;C1852093:Maturity-onset diabetes of the young type 1;C4014962:Fanconi renotubular syndrome 4 with maturity-onset diabetes of the young

Benign:1

Nov 05, 2021

Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Maturity onset diabetes mellitus in young

Benign:1

Oct 23, 2018

Ambry Genetics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.35

CADD

Benign

2.7

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.63

PhyloP100

-0.78

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.7

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over