Menu
GeneBe

rs61004744

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_001267550.2(TTN):c.45526C>T(p.Leu15176=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00432 in 1,612,420 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 238 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.022 ( 121 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0025 ( 117 hom. )

Consequence

TTN
NM_001267550.2 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:20

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.31
Variant links:
Genes affected
TTN (HGNC:12403): (titin) This gene encodes a large abundant protein of striated muscle. The product of this gene is divided into two regions, a N-terminal I-band and a C-terminal A-band. The I-band, which is the elastic part of the molecule, contains two regions of tandem immunoglobulin domains on either side of a PEVK region that is rich in proline, glutamate, valine and lysine. The A-band, which is thought to act as a protein-ruler, contains a mixture of immunoglobulin and fibronectin repeats, and possesses kinase activity. An N-terminal Z-disc region and a C-terminal M-line region bind to the Z-line and M-line of the sarcomere, respectively, so that a single titin molecule spans half the length of a sarcomere. Titin also contains binding sites for muscle associated proteins so it serves as an adhesion template for the assembly of contractile machinery in muscle cells. It has also been identified as a structural protein for chromosomes. Alternative splicing of this gene results in multiple transcript variants. Considerable variability exists in the I-band, the M-line and the Z-disc regions of titin. Variability in the I-band region contributes to the differences in elasticity of different titin isoforms and, therefore, to the differences in elasticity of different muscle types. Mutations in this gene are associated with familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 9, and autoantibodies to titin are produced in patients with the autoimmune disease scleroderma. [provided by RefSeq, Feb 2012]
TTN-AS1 (HGNC:44124): (TTN antisense RNA 1) This gene encodes a non-coding RNA transcribed from the opposite strand to the titin gene. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2016]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.71).
BP6
Variant 2-178621192-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-178621192-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 46990.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr2-178621192-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr2-178621192-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=2.31 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.0731 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
TTNNM_001267550.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.45526C>T p.Leu15176= synonymous_variant 246/363 ENST00000589042.5

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
TTNENST00000589042.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.45526C>T p.Leu15176= synonymous_variant 246/3635 NM_001267550.2 P1
TTN-AS1ENST00000659121.1 linkuse as main transcriptn.502+23511G>A intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0219
AC:
3319
AN:
151768
Hom.:
121
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0754
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00934
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000414
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00316
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000412
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0134
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00591
AC:
1465
AN:
247708
Hom.:
44
AF XY:
0.00423
AC XY:
569
AN XY:
134388
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0812
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00408
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.000262
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000366
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00367
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00250
AC:
3645
AN:
1460534
Hom.:
117
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00221
AC XY:
1605
AN XY:
726564
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0846
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00455
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0000253
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.000186
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000231
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00521
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0219
AC:
3323
AN:
151886
Hom.:
121
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0209
AC XY:
1551
AN XY:
74218
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0753
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00939
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000413
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.0133
Alfa
AF:
0.00990
Hom.:
23
Bravo
AF:
0.0248
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00520
AC:
18
AN:
3476
EpiCase
AF:
0.000382
EpiControl
AF:
0.000653

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:20
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:7
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpAug 27, 2019- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineMay 10, 2012Leu12608Leu in exon 195 of TTN: This variant is not expected to have clinical si gnificance because it has been identified in 7.1% (225/3176) of African American chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (http ://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS/; dbSNP rs61004744) -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxApr 30, 2013This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago-Likely benign based on allele frequency in 1000 Genomes Project or ESP global frequency and its presence in a patient with a rare or unrelated disease phenotype. NOT Sanger confirmed. -
Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2J Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabSep 10, 2021- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Early-onset myopathy with fatal cardiomyopathy Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabSep 10, 2021- -
Tibial muscular dystrophy Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabSep 10, 2021- -
Myopathy, myofibrillar, 9, with early respiratory failure Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabSep 10, 2021- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2J;C1858763:Dilated cardiomyopathy 1G Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 31, 2024- -
Cardiomyopathy Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern OntarioDec 03, 2015- -
Dilated cardiomyopathy 1G Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -
not provided Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesSep 06, 2023- -
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsMar 05, 2013This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.71
Cadd
Benign
0.56
Dann
Benign
0.76

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs61004744; hg19: chr2-179485919; API