rs61747635

chr16-68823553-G-Achr16-68823553-G-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points: 0P and 10B. BP4_Strong BP6 BP7 BS2

The NM_004360.5(CDH1):c.2091G>A(p.Lys697=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000118 in 1,613,948 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

• Frequency:
  • Genomes: 𝑓 0.0000066 (0 hom., cov: 31)
  • Exomes 𝑓: 0.000012 (0 hom.)
• Consequence: CDH1 NM_004360.5 synonymous
• Clinical Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1 B:7
• Conservation: PhyloP100: 0.265

Genes affected

CDH1 (HGNC:1748): (cadherin 1) This gene encodes a classical cadherin of the cadherin superfamily. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants, at least one of which encodes a preproprotein that is proteolytically processed to generate the mature glycoprotein. This calcium-dependent cell-cell adhesion protein is comprised of five extracellular cadherin repeats, a transmembrane region and a highly conserved cytoplasmic tail. Mutations in this gene are correlated with gastric, breast, colorectal, thyroid and ovarian cancer. Loss of function of this gene is thought to contribute to cancer progression by increasing proliferation, invasion, and/or metastasis. The ectodomain of this protein mediates bacterial adhesion to mammalian cells and the cytoplasmic domain is required for internalization. This gene is present in a gene cluster with other members of the cadherin family on chromosome 16. [provided by RefSeq, Nov 2015]

(HGNC:):

ACMG classification

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points.

• BP4: Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.73).
• BP6: Variant 16-68823553-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr16-68823553-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 182381.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=6, Benign=1, Uncertain_significance=1}.
• BP7: Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.265 with no splicing effect.
• BS2: High AC in GnomAdExome at 7 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	UniProt
CDH1	NM_004360.5	c.2091G>A	p.Lys697=	synonymous_variant	13/16	ENST00000261769.10
CDH1	NM_001317184.2	c.1908G>A	p.Lys636=	synonymous_variant	12/15
CDH1	NM_001317185.2	c.543G>A	p.Lys181=	synonymous_variant	13/16
CDH1	NM_001317186.2	c.126G>A	p.Lys42=	synonymous_variant	12/15

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Appris	UniProt
CDH1	ENST00000261769.10	c.2091G>A	p.Lys697=	synonymous_variant	13/16	1	NM_004360.5	P1
	ENST00000563916.1			upstream_gene_variant		4

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1 AN: 152162 Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31

Gnomad AFR AF: 0.00

Gnomad AMI AF: 0.00

Gnomad AMR AF: 0.00

Gnomad ASJ AF: 0.00

Gnomad EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad SAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad MID AF: 0.00

Gnomad NFE AF: 0.0000147

Gnomad OTH AF: 0.00

GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000279 AC: 7 AN: 251306 Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000221 AC XY: 3 AN XY: 135830

Gnomad AFR exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad AMR exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad EAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad SAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad FIN exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad NFE exome AF: 0.0000616

Gnomad OTH exome AF: 0.00

GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000123 AC: 18 AN: 1461786 Hom.: 0 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.0000110 AC XY: 8 AN XY: 727188

Gnomad4 AFR exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 AMR exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 FIN exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome AF: 0.0000162

Gnomad4 OTH exome AF: 0.00

GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1 AN: 152162 Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000135 AC XY: 1 AN XY: 74320

Gnomad4 AFR AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 AMR AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 SAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 NFE AF: 0.0000147

Gnomad4 OTH AF: 0.00

Bravo AF: 0.00000378

EpiCase AF: 0.0000545

EpiControl AF: 0.00

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1 Benign:7

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

Submissions by phenotype

Hereditary diffuse gastric adenocarcinoma Uncertain:1 Benign:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	European Reference Network on Genetic Tumour Risk Syndromes (ERN-GENTURIS), i3s - Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, University of Porto	Aug 01, 2022	PS4_Supporting (PMID: 30311375) -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Invitae	Oct 04, 2023	- -

not specified Benign:2

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	GeneDx	Aug 04, 2014	This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp	Jan 31, 2020	- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health	Jun 15, 2017	- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Ambry Genetics	Dec 11, 2014	This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

CDH1-related disorder Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Jul 30, 2019

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

not provided Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Feb 01, 2019

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
BayesDel_noAF	Benign	-0.73
Cadd	Benign	3.2
Dann	Benign	0.54
RBP_binding_hub_radar		0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar		1.1

Splicing

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)		0.0		Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs61747635; hg19: chr16-68857456;