rs73969727
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_024753.5(TTC21B):c.2211+13A>G variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00705 in 1,585,854 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 644 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.038 ( 340 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0038 ( 304 hom. )
Consequence
TTC21B
NM_024753.5 intron
NM_024753.5 intron
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -0.251
Genes affected
TTC21B (HGNC:25660): (tetratricopeptide repeat domain 21B) This gene encodes a member of TTC21 family, containing several tetratricopeptide repeat (TPR) domains. This protein is localized to the cilium axoneme, and may play a role in retrograde intraflagellar transport in cilia. Mutations in this gene are associated with various ciliopathies, nephronophthisis 12, and asphyxiating thoracic dystrophy 4. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2011]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
BP4
?
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.82).
BP6
?
Variant 2-165913561-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-165913561-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 261773.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr2-165913561-T-C is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BA1
?
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.128 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TTC21B | NM_024753.5 | c.2211+13A>G | intron_variant | ENST00000243344.8 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TTC21B | ENST00000243344.8 | c.2211+13A>G | intron_variant | 1 | NM_024753.5 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? AF: 0.0376 AC: 5714AN: 152082Hom.: 339 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
?
AF:
AC:
5714
AN:
152082
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00964 AC: 2402AN: 249180Hom.: 156 AF XY: 0.00686 AC XY: 926AN XY: 135020
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
2402
AN:
249180
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
926
AN XY:
135020
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00381 AC: 5465AN: 1433654Hom.: 304 Cov.: 26 AF XY: 0.00327 AC XY: 2340AN XY: 715010
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
5465
AN:
1433654
Hom.:
Cov.:
26
AF XY:
AC XY:
2340
AN XY:
715010
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome ? AF: 0.0376 AC: 5721AN: 152200Hom.: 340 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0364 AC XY: 2706AN XY: 74404
GnomAD4 genome
?
AF:
AC:
5721
AN:
152200
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
2706
AN XY:
74404
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
28
AN:
3478
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:7
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Apr 20, 2016 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | - | - - |
Asphyxiating thoracic dystrophy 4 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Jeune thoracic dystrophy;C0687120:Nephronophthisis Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Nephronophthisis 12 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
Cadd
Benign
Dann
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at